Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Shaik Rafeeq Ahmed, proprietor of Royal
Traders, was engaged in the lawful business of tobacco products under a
valid GST registration, valid waybills, necessary licences, and payment of
applicable taxes. Despite the Supreme Court having granted an interim stay on
the Telangana Government's Tobacco Prohibition Notification dated 07.01.2022,
the local police authorities allegedly continued to interfere with and harass
the petitioner's business activities.
The petitioner therefore approached the Telangana High Court
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking protection
against unlawful interference by the police authorities.
Issues Involved
- Whether
police authorities can interfere with the lawful business activities of a
licensed tobacco trader despite the Supreme Court's interim stay on the
State Government's prohibition notification.
- Whether
the petitioner was entitled to protection under Article 226 against
arbitrary interference by law enforcement authorities.
- Whether
the earlier judgment passed in W.P. No.34806 of 2022 and batch was
applicable to the present case.
Petitioner's Arguments
- The
petitioner submitted that he was carrying on business legally under a
valid GST registration, valid licences and valid transport documents.
- It
was argued that the Telangana Government's prohibition notification dated
07.01.2022 had already been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
connected Special Leave Petitions.
- Despite
the subsistence of the Supreme Court's interim order, the respondents
continued to interfere with the petitioner's lawful business operations.
- Such
interference was arbitrary, illegal and violative of the principles of
natural justice and therefore liable to be restrained by the High Court.
Respondent's Arguments
- The
learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the controversy
involved in the present writ petition was already covered by the earlier
judgment dated 21.09.2022 passed by the Telangana High Court in W.P.
No.34806 of 2022 & batch.
- Both
parties agreed that the present matter could be disposed of in terms of
the earlier decision.
Court Order / Findings
The Telangana High Court observed that the issue stood
squarely covered by its earlier judgment in W.P. No.34806 of 2022 &
batch.
The Court noted that:
- The
Supreme Court had stayed the operation of the Telangana Government's
Tobacco Prohibition Notification dated 07.01.2022.
- During
the subsistence of the Supreme Court's interim orders, the respondents
were not entitled to interfere with the petitioner's lawful business
activities.
- The
Director General of Police had also issued instructions to all concerned
officers, and any action contrary to those directions would be viewed
seriously.
Accordingly, the High Court disposed of the writ petition by
directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's business
activities for so long as the Supreme Court's interim orders remained in force.
No order as to costs was passed.
Important Clarification
- A
lawful trader possessing valid GST registration, licences and transport
documents cannot ordinarily be subjected to police interference when the
relevant prohibition notification has been stayed by the Supreme Court.
- The
judgment reiterates that authorities are bound by interim orders of the
Supreme Court.
- The
decision follows the earlier precedent in W.P. No.34806 of 2022 &
batch, ensuring consistency in judicial protection granted to
similarly situated traders.
- The
Court also emphasized compliance with the Director General of Police's
circular directing officers not to act contrary to the Supreme Court's
interim protection.
Sections / Provisions Involved
- Article
226 of the Constitution of India
- Section
151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Interlocutory
Application)
- Cigarettes
and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 (COTPA, 2003)
- Telangana
Government Notification No. 501/FSS-1/2022 dated 07.01.2022
- GST
Registration and statutory compliance (factual background)
Link to Download the Order
https://mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1785138855_2039compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment