Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Syed Rasheed, was engaged in the lawful
business of tobacco products under a valid licence and GST registration, while
regularly paying applicable taxes. Despite the petitioner carrying on business
through valid invoices and statutory registrations, the authorities allegedly
continued to interfere with his day-to-day business operations.
The petitioner contended that although the Government of
Telangana had issued Notification No. 501/FSS-1/2022 dated 07.01.2022
prohibiting certain tobacco products, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had granted
an interim stay on the operation of the notification in connected
proceedings. In spite of the subsisting stay, the authorities allegedly
continued to obstruct the petitioner's lawful business activities.
Accordingly, the petitioner approached the Telangana High
Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking protection
against such interference.
Issues Involved
- Whether
the State authorities could interfere with the petitioner's licensed
tobacco business despite the Supreme Court's interim stay on the Telangana
Government's tobacco prohibition notification.
- Whether
continued interference by enforcement authorities amounted to arbitrary
action contrary to judicial orders.
- Whether
the petitioner was entitled to protection under Article 226 of the
Constitution against such interference.
Petitioner's Arguments
- The
petitioner was conducting business lawfully under a valid licence, GST
registration and tax compliance.
- The
Telangana Government's tobacco prohibition notification dated 07.01.2022
had already been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
- Despite
the subsisting stay, officials continued interfering with the petitioner's
business activities.
- Such
interference was arbitrary, illegal and violative of the principles of
natural justice.
- The petitioner sought a writ directing the authorities not to interfere with his lawful business until the Supreme Court decided the matter.
Respondents' Arguments
The respondents relied upon the Government's regulatory powers. During the hearing, however, both sides submitted that the controversy was already covered by the judgment rendered by the Telangana High Court in W.P. No. 34806 of 2022 & batch, decided on 21.09.2022, which had dealt with the identical issue arising out of the same tobacco prohibition notification.
Court Order / Findings
The Telangana High Court observed that the present writ
petition was squarely covered by its earlier judgment in W.P. No.34806 of
2022 & batch.
The Court reiterated that:
- The Supreme
Court had stayed the operation of Notification No. 501/FSS-1/2022 dated
07.01.2022.
- So
long as the Supreme Court's interim orders continued to operate, the
authorities were not entitled to interfere with the petitioner's
business activities.
- The
Court also took note that the Director General of Police had already
issued appropriate circulars to the concerned officers.
- It
further observed that any action taken contrary to such judicial
directions would be viewed seriously.
Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's business activities during the subsistence of the Supreme Court's interim orders, with no order as to costs.
Important Clarification
- The
judgment does not declare the tobacco prohibition notification invalid.
- The
High Court merely enforced compliance with the existing interim stay
granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
- Protection
from interference remains operative only so long as the Supreme Court's
interim orders continue to remain in force.
- Authorities are expected to strictly comply with judicial directions and departmental circulars issued pursuant thereto.
Sections / Provisions Involved
- Article
226 of the Constitution of India
- Section
151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Interlocutory Application)
- Notification
No. 501/FSS-1/2022 dated 07.01.2022
- Supreme Court Interim Orders in SLP(C) Nos. 1656 of 2022, 5399 of 2022 and connected matters
Link to Download the Order
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1785144176_2083compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment