Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s Castmaster Mobitec India Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad, approached the Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking relief regarding the filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms for claiming transitional input tax credit under the GST regime. During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents brought to the notice of the Court the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another, whereby the GST portal was directed to be reopened for all eligible taxpayers to file or revise TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms within the prescribed period. In view of the Supreme Court's directions and the respondents' assurance to comply with them, the petitioner chose not to press the writ petition.
Issues Involved
- Whether
the petitioner should be granted an opportunity to file or revise
TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms for claiming transitional input tax credit.
- Whether
the writ petition required adjudication after the Supreme Court issued
comprehensive directions reopening the GST portal for all eligible
taxpayers.
- Whether the petitioner could avail the benefit of the Supreme Court's directions without further adjudication by the High Court.
Petitioner's Arguments
- The
petitioner sought relief for filing or revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms in
order to claim the transitional input tax credit available under Section
140 of the CGST Act.
- Upon being informed that the respondents would comply with the Supreme Court's directions reopening the GST portal for all eligible taxpayers, the petitioner submitted that the writ petition was no longer required to be pursued and did not press the same.
Respondent's Arguments
- The
respondents informed the High Court that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Union
of India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another,
had already issued binding directions requiring GSTN to reopen the common
portal for filing or revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms.
- The respondents further assured the Court that there would be meticulous compliance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court.
Court Order / Findings
The Punjab & Haryana High Court observed that the
controversy stood substantially covered by the directions issued by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Union of India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt.
Ltd. & Another.
Considering the respondents' undertaking that the Supreme
Court's directions would be duly implemented, and since the petitioner did not
wish to pursue the writ petition any further, the Court disposed of the
petition as not pressed.
The Court also disposed of all pending applications, if any.
Important Clarification
The judgment reiterates the implementation of the Supreme
Court's directions in Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd., which provided that:
- GSTN
shall reopen the common portal for filing or revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2.
- All
aggrieved registered taxpayers are entitled to file or revise the relevant
forms irrespective of whether they had filed writ petitions or whether
their claims had earlier been decided by the IT Grievance Redressal
Committee.
- GST
authorities shall verify the claims on merits after granting reasonable
opportunity of hearing.
- The
admissible transitional credit shall thereafter be reflected in the
Electronic Credit Ledger.
- The GST Council may issue appropriate guidelines for scrutiny of such claims.
Sections Involved
- Section
140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Transitional
Input Tax Credit (TRAN-1 / TRAN-2)
- Electronic Credit Ledger provisions under the CGST framewor
Link to Download the Order
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1785305661_2166compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment