Facts of the Case
M/s Ethos Limited filed the present writ petition before the
Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking relief relating to the filing/revision
of TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms for claiming Transitional Input Tax Credit (ITC) under
the GST regime.
During the hearing, the respondents informed the Court that
the Hon'ble Supreme Court had already passed comprehensive directions in Union
of India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another dated
22.07.2022, directing GSTN to reopen the common portal for filing or revising
TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms for all eligible registered taxpayers.
Since the Supreme Court had already granted the relief sought, the petitioner chose not to press the writ petition.
Issues Involved
- Whether
registered taxpayers should be allowed to file or revise TRAN-1/TRAN-2 for
claiming Transitional Input Tax Credit.
- Whether
the petition required adjudication after the Supreme Court had already
issued nationwide directions in the Filco Trade Centre case.
- Whether the petitioner was entitled to avail the benefit of the reopening of the GST portal.
Petitioner's Arguments
- The
petitioner sought permission to claim eligible Transitional Input Tax
Credit through TRAN-1/TRAN-2.
- It
was submitted that the petitioner was entitled to avail the benefit of
transitional credit under the CGST Act.
- After the respondents referred to the Supreme Court's directions reopening the GST portal, the petitioner did not press the petition since the required relief had already become available.
Respondent's Arguments
The respondents submitted that:
- The
Hon'ble Supreme Court had already passed binding directions in Union of
India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another.
- GSTN
had been directed to reopen the common portal from 01.09.2022 to
31.10.2022 for filing or revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2.
- Eligible
taxpayers could file or revise their claims irrespective of whether:
- a
writ petition had been filed,
- the
matter had been decided by the IT Grievance Redressal Committee, or
- technical
difficulties had earlier prevented filing.
- The respondents assured the Court that the Supreme Court's directions would be complied with.
Court Order / Findings
The Punjab & Haryana High Court observed that:
- The
controversy had already been addressed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
Filco Trade Centre judgment.
- Since
the respondents agreed to comply with the Supreme Court's directions and
the petitioner did not wish to pursue the petition further, the writ
petition was disposed of as not pressed.
- All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly.
Important Clarification
The Supreme Court directions referred to by the High Court
provided that:
- GSTN
should reopen the common portal for filing/revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2.
- Every
aggrieved registered taxpayer could file or revise the forms.
- The
benefit was available irrespective of whether a writ petition had been
filed.
- GSTN
was directed to ensure that no technical glitches occurred.
- Tax
authorities were given 90 days to verify the claims.
- Eligible
transitional credit was to be reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger
after verification.
- GST Council could issue appropriate guidelines for scrutiny of such claims.
Sections Involved
- Section
140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 –
Transitional Input Tax Credit
- Rule
117 of the CGST Rules, 2017 (Relevant to filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2)
- Directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another
Link to Download the Order
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1785303904_2159compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment