Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s The Morinda Cooperative
Sugar Mills Limited, Rupnagar, approached the Punjab & Haryana High
Court seeking relief regarding the filing of statutory forms for claiming Transitional
Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the GST regime. During the hearing, the
respondents brought to the notice of the Court the subsequent judgment and
directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India &
Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another concerning the
reopening of the GST portal for filing or revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2
forms.
Issues Involved
- Whether the writ petition seeking permission to claim Transitional
ITC survived after the Supreme Court issued comprehensive directions in Filco
Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.
- Whether taxpayers were entitled to file or revise TRAN-1 and TRAN-2
forms pursuant to the Supreme Court's directions.
- Whether any further adjudication by the High Court was necessary in
light of the Supreme Court's binding order.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The petitioner had approached the High Court for appropriate relief
relating to Transitional ITC under GST.
- After the respondents informed the Court about the Supreme Court's
decision reopening the GST portal for all eligible taxpayers, counsel for
the petitioner stated that, in view of the relief already granted by the
Supreme Court, the writ petition was no longer required to be pressed.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The respondents relied upon the Supreme Court's order dated 22.07.2022
in Union of India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. &
Another.
- It was submitted that:
- GSTN had been directed to reopen the common portal for filing or
revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms.
- The reopening would be available to all eligible registered
taxpayers irrespective of whether they had approached any High Court or
whether their cases had been considered by the IT Grievance Redressal
Committee.
- Appropriate verification of Transitional Credit claims would
thereafter be undertaken by the concerned authorities.
- The respondents further assured the Court that the Supreme Court's
directions would be complied with meticulously.
Court Order / Findings
The Punjab & Haryana High Court observed that
the issue raised in the writ petition stood adequately covered by the
directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India &
Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another.
Since the respondents undertook to comply with the
Supreme Court's directions and the petitioner chose not to press the writ
petition, the High Court disposed of the petition. All pending applications
were also disposed of accordingly.
Important Clarification
- The judgment does not independently adjudicate the merits of
the Transitional ITC claim.
- The High Court disposed of the matter solely because the Supreme
Court had already provided a complete mechanism for filing or revising
TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms.
- The Supreme Court's directions applied to all aggrieved
registered taxpayers, irrespective of whether they had filed writ
petitions before High Courts.
- Verification of Transitional Credit claims remained subject to
scrutiny by the proper GST authorities on merits after providing an
opportunity of hearing.
- The judgment reinforces that High Courts may dispose of pending
Transitional Credit matters where relief is already covered by the Supreme
Court's decision in Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.
Section Involved
- Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Transitional Input Tax Credit Provisions
- TRAN-1
- TRAN-2
Link to Download the Order-https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1785319713_2212compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment