Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s Shyam Sunder Girdhar Gopal, challenged three identical assessment orders dated 22.04.2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Circle Nagaur under Section 74(1) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (RGST Act). The assessment orders imposed tax, interest, and penalty upon the petitioner. The petitioner approached the Rajasthan High Court by filing writ petitions seeking quashing of the assessment orders.
Issues Involved
- Whether
a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable against assessment
orders passed under Section 74(1) of the RGST Act when an effective
statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act is
available.
- Whether
the assessment orders were liable to be set aside on the ground of
violation of the principles of natural justice due to the alleged denial
of personal hearing.
- Whether the petitioner could invoke the writ jurisdiction despite having voluntarily declined the option of personal hearing in Form GST DRC-06.
Petitioner's Arguments
- The
petitioner challenged the assessment orders passed under Section 74(1) of
the RGST Act.
- It
was contended that the assessment proceedings suffered from violation of
the principles of natural justice.
- The petitioner sought intervention of the High Court under Article 226 for setting aside the impugned orders.
Respondent's Arguments
The State raised preliminary objections regarding the
maintainability of the writ petitions and submitted that:
- The
petitioner had an effective statutory remedy of appeal under Section
107 of the CGST Act, and therefore the writ petitions were not
maintainable.
- Reliance
was placed upon the Supreme Court judgment in Assistant Commissioner of
State Tax & Ors. vs M/s Commercial Steel Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 5121
of 2021).
- Reliance
was also placed on Bhaskar Laxman Jadhav & Ors. vs Karamveer
Kakasaheb Wagh Education Society & Ors. (2013) 11 SCC 531.
- The
petitioner had submitted replies to the notices and had consciously
selected "No" for personal hearing in Form GST DRC-06
dated 15.04.2021.
- Since
the petitioner voluntarily declined personal hearing, there was no
violation of the principles of natural justice.
- The assessment orders were reasoned orders passed after considering the petitioner's replies and could appropriately be challenged before the appellate authority.
Court Order / Findings
The Rajasthan High Court held that:
- The
petitioner had consciously opted not to avail personal hearing
while filing Form GST DRC-06.
- Consequently,
the assessment orders could not be said to have been passed in violation
of the principles of natural justice.
- Since
a statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act was
available, the writ petitions were not maintainable.
- Following
the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in Assistant Commissioner of
State Tax vs M/s Commercial Steel Ltd., the Court declined to exercise
writ jurisdiction.
- The
Court relegated the petitioner to avail the statutory appellate remedy.
- Accordingly,
all the writ petitions were dismissed, while granting liberty to the
petitioner to file appeals under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
- No order as to costs was passed.
Important Clarification
- Mere
allegation of violation of natural justice will not make a writ petition
maintainable where the taxpayer has voluntarily declined the opportunity
of personal hearing.
- When
an effective appellate remedy exists under Section 107 of the CGST Act,
High Courts ordinarily refrain from entertaining writ petitions against
GST assessment orders.
- Selection
of "No" for personal hearing in Form GST DRC-06 amounts
to conscious waiver of such opportunity.
- Assessment orders passed under Section 74(1) of the RGST Act should ordinarily be challenged before the appellate authority instead of invoking writ jurisdiction.
Sections Involved
- Section
74(1), Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Section
107, Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Related Case Laws
- Assistant
Commissioner of State Tax & Ors. vs M/s Commercial Steel Ltd. (Civil
Appeal No. 5121 of 2021)
- Bhaskar Laxman Jadhav & Ors. vs Karamveer Kakasaheb Wagh Education Society & Ors. (2013) 11 SCC 531
Link to Download the Order
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1785391174_2295compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment