Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s Indwell Constructions Private
Limited, challenged the Show Cause Notice dated 05.04.2021 and sought the
benefit of transitional Input Tax Credit that could not be effectively carried
forward into the GST regime. The petitioner also requested permission to file
or revise GST TRAN-1 electronically or manually, transfer transitional credit
from the ISD registration to the principal GST registration, and challenged the
constitutional validity of Section 128 of the Finance Act, 2020, Rule 117, Rule
120A of the CGST Rules, and Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST.
Issues Involved
- Whether the petitioner should be permitted to file or revise GST
TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 to claim transitional Input Tax Credit.
- Whether the petitioner was entitled to carry forward transitional
credit under Section 140 of the CGST Act.
- Whether the challenge to Section 128 of the Finance Act, 2020, Rule
117, Rule 120A and the related GST Circular required adjudication in view
of the Supreme Court directions.
- Whether the authorities were required to verify and allow eligible
transitional credit after reopening of the GST portal.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The petitioner submitted that it had been deprived of its
legitimate transitional Input Tax Credit.
- It sought permission to file or revise GST TRAN-1 either
electronically or manually to claim the entire eligible credit.
- It requested transfer of transitional credit from the ISD
registration to the principal GST registration.
- The petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of Section
128 of the Finance Act, 2020, Rule 117, Rule 120A, and the impugned GST
Circular, contending that the prescribed time limits were arbitrary and
beyond the scope of Section 140 of the CGST Act.
Respondent’s Arguments
The respondents submitted that the issue regarding
filing or revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 had already been considered by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 32709-32710 of 2018. The
Supreme Court had directed reopening of the GST portal for all eligible
taxpayers to file or revise TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 and had also provided a mechanism
for verification of transitional credit claims by the tax authorities.
Court Order / Findings
The Andhra Pradesh High Court observed that the
controversy stood substantially covered by the directions issued by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court regarding reopening of the GST portal for filing or revising
TRAN-1 and TRAN-2.
The Court further noted that the Supreme Court had
subsequently extended the time for opening the GST common portal after the
Union of India sought extension due to technical difficulties.
Accordingly, the High Court disposed of the writ
petition by directing that the petitioner's case shall be governed by the same
directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The authorities were required
to process the claim in accordance with those directions, verify the
transitional credit on merits, provide reasonable opportunity of hearing, and
reflect the admissible credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger.
Important Clarification
- The judgment reiterates that eligible registered persons are
entitled to file or revise TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 in accordance with the
directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
- The benefit is available irrespective of whether a taxpayer had
previously approached the High Court or the IT Grievance Redressal
Committee.
- The tax authorities must verify transitional credit claims on
merits before allowing or rejecting them.
- Admissible transitional credit is required to be reflected in the
Electronic Credit Ledger after verification.
- The decision follows the binding directions of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court concerning reopening of the GST portal for transitional credit
claims.
Sections Involved
- Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017
- Section 128 of the Finance Act, 2020
- Rule 117 of the CGST Rules, 2017
- Rule 120A of the CGST Rules, 2017
- Articles 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution of India
Link to Download the Order https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1785395205_2324compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment