Facts
of the Case
The
petitioner, Alankar Promoters LLP (earlier Alankar Promoters Pvt.
Ltd.), challenged a notice dated 31.03.2019 issued under Section
148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2012-13.
The
original assessee company was incorporated on 07.09.2011 and had filed
its return declaring Nil income, which was processed under Section
143(1). The balance sheet disclosed an interest-free unsecured loan of
₹5,00,000 received from a director, which was repaid in the subsequent year
through banking channels.
In
January 2019, the company was reconstituted as an LLP. The reassessment was
initiated solely on the basis that the assessee had shown an unsecured loan
despite not carrying out business activity during the year. The petitioner
challenged both the reopening notice and the reassessment order passed
thereafter.
Issues
Involved
Whether the Assessing Officer had valid
“reason to believe” that income had escaped assessment under Section 147.
Whether mere reflection of an
unsecured loan in the balance sheet constitutes tangible material for
reopening assessment.
Whether reassessment proceedings
initiated beyond four years satisfy statutory jurisdictional
requirements.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The
petitioner contended that:
The reassessment was initiated without
any tangible material indicating escapement of income.
The unsecured loan of ₹5,00,000 was fully
disclosed in the balance sheet and notes to accounts and was received from
a director through proper banking channels.
There was no allegation or material
suggesting that the loan represented undisclosed or taxable income.
The notice was based on mere
suspicion, not “reason to believe,” and therefore lacked jurisdiction.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The
Revenue argued that:
The assessee had not carried out any
business activity during the year, yet had shown an unsecured loan.
This fact, according to the Assessing
Officer, gave rise to a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped
assessment.
Since no assessment under Section 143(3)
had been completed earlier, the reopening was permissible under law.
Court
Order / Findings
The
Delhi High Court held that:
“Reason to believe” must be founded on
tangible material
having a live link with the formation of belief that income has escaped
assessment.
Mere existence of an unsecured loan in the balance sheet cannot,
by itself, justify reopening of assessment.
There was no material whatsoever to indicate that the
loan was unexplained, non-genuine, or taxable under the Act.
The Assessing Officer acted on assumptions and conjectures,
amounting at best to “reason to suspect,” which is impermissible in law.
The
Court relied upon and reiterated settled principles laid down in:
Chhugamal Rajpal v. S.P. Chaliha
ITO v. Lakhmani Mewal Das
CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.
and
held that the jurisdictional conditions under Sections 147/148 were not
satisfied.
Important
Clarification
The
Court clarified that:
Reassessment powers, though wide, are not
plenary.
Full and true disclosure in the
balance sheet negates any inference of escapement
in the absence of contrary material.
Reopening of assessment cannot be
based on vague, remote, or far-fetched reasoning.
The statutory requirement is “reason
to believe,” not “reason to suspect.”
Final
Outcome
Writ
Petition Allowed
Notice issued under Section 148 set
aside
Reassessment order passed under Sections
143(3)/147 quashed
The
Court held that the reassessment proceedings were without jurisdiction and
unsustainable in law.
link
to download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1770191486_ALANKARPROMOTERSLLPEARLIERALANKARPROMOTERSPVT.LTD.VsINCOMETAXOFFICERORS..pdf
Disclaimer
This
content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only.
Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It
is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The
author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this
content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment