Facts of the
Case
The writ petitions were filed by Microsoft India
(R&D) Pvt. Ltd., challenging multiple final assessment orders passed by
the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer pursuant to remand directions issued by
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
The petitioner is an eligible assessee
within the meaning of Section 144C(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the
assessments involved transfer pricing adjustments. After remand by the ITAT for
fresh determination, the Assessing Officer directly passed final assessment
orders without first issuing a draft assessment order, accompanied by demand
notices under Section 156 and penalty initiation notices.
The petitioner contended that such action violated
the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 144C of the Act.
Issues
Involved
Whether a final assessment order
passed without issuing a draft assessment order under Section 144C(1) of the
Income-tax Act is legally sustainable.
Whether compliance with Section
144C is mandatory even in remand proceedings pursuant to ITAT directions.
Whether failure to issue a draft
assessment order vitiates the entire assessment proceedings, including
consequential demand and penalty notices.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The petitioner argued that:
Section 144C creates a substantive
statutory right in favour of an eligible assessee to receive a draft
assessment order and raise objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel
(DRP).
The Assessing Officer acted without
jurisdiction by bypassing the mandatory procedure and directly issuing
final assessment orders.
The violation of Section 144C
could not be cured by subsequent proceedings, as it goes to the root of the
assessment.
Reliance was placed on binding
precedents, including Turner International India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT and Headstrong
Services India Pvt. Ltd., wherein similar assessment orders were quashed.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue contended that:
The assessments were framed
pursuant to remand directions and, therefore, issuance of a draft assessment
order was not necessary.
The procedure adopted
substantially complied with the requirements of the Act.
No prejudice was caused to the
assessee, as opportunities of hearing were otherwise provided.
Court Order
/ Findings
The Delhi High Court rejected the Revenue’s
contentions and held that:
Section 144C is mandatory and
not directory, and its non-compliance renders the final assessment order
void ab initio.
The obligation to issue a draft
assessment order applies even in remand proceedings, provided the
assessee continues to qualify as an eligible assessee.
The Assessing Officer has no
discretion to bypass the statutory mechanism under Section 144C.
The Court reaffirmed and followed
its earlier rulings, particularly Turner International India Pvt. Ltd. v.
DCIT, holding that failure to issue a draft assessment order is a jurisdictional
defect, not a procedural irregularity.
Accordingly, the impugned final assessment orders,
along with consequential demand notices and penalty proceedings, were set
aside.
Important
Clarification
The Court clarified that:
Compliance with Section 144C is independent
of the stage of proceedings and applies equally to original assessments and
remand proceedings.
The right to approach the DRP is
a valuable statutory safeguard, and denial of such right cannot be
condoned on grounds of administrative convenience or technical interpretation.
Any assessment framed in
violation of Section 144C is non est in law, irrespective of the merits
of the additions made.
Link to
download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1770193795_MICROSOFTINDIARDPVT.LTD.VsDEPUTYCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXANR..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment