Facts of the Case

The petitioner, Subash Chandra Mohanty, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack against the State of Odisha and other opposite parties, in relation to a grievance arising under the CT & GST Department's administration of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The matter, heard through hybrid mode by a Division Bench comprising the Acting Chief Justice and Justice Murahari Sri Raman, was disposed of without independent facts, arguments or reasoning being recorded, the Court instead holding that it stood governed by the common order dated 06.11.2023 passed in W.P.(C) No.6684 of 2023 and a batch of connected writ petitions, titled M/s. Pravat Kumar Choudhury and others v. Additional State Tax Officer, CT & GST, Cuttack and others. As with related matters decided on the same day, the precise grievance and relief addressed by the underlying common order are not set out in this order sheet.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the petitioner's grievance against the State of Odisha and the CT & GST Department is governed by, and stands disposed of in terms of, the common order rendered in the Pravat Kumar Choudhury batch of writ petitions.

Petitioner's Arguments

  • Not separately recorded in this order; the petition appears to have proceeded on the basis that it raised the same grievance against the CT & GST authorities as the batch of matters covered by the Pravat Kumar Choudhury common order.

Respondent's Arguments

  • Not separately recorded in this order; the CT & GST Department did not contest that the petition fell within the scope of the common order relied upon.

Court Order/Findings

  • The Court, without recording any independent reasoning, disposed of the writ petition in terms of the common order dated 06.11.2023 passed in W.P.(C) No.6684 of 2023 and batch (M/s. Pravat Kumar Choudhury and others v. Additional State Tax Officer, CT & GST, Cuttack and others).
  • No separate operative directions specific to this petitioner appear on the face of the order sheet.

Important Clarification

When the Orissa High Court disposes of a writ petition "in terms of" a named common or batch order, the actual relief available to that particular petitioner can only be ascertained by reading the underlying common judgment. A one-line disposal order of this kind carries no independent ratio of its own; readers relying on it for the substantive law should always locate and read the referenced batch order — here, the common order dated 06.11.2023 in the Pravat Kumar Choudhury batch — rather than treating the short disposal order as authority in itself. Multiple petitioners appear to have had their CT & GST grievances cleared through this same route on or around 8-9 November 2023.

Sections Involved

  • Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — the general statute under which the CT & GST authorities were proceeding; the specific provision at issue is not identifiable from the text of this order alone.
  • W.P.(C) No.6684 of 2023 and batch (Pravat Kumar Choudhury and others) — the lead common order dated 06.11.2023 whose terms govern the disposal of this and other connected petitions before the same Bench.

Decision – In Favour of

This is a purely procedural disposal, and no independent finding is recorded on the face of this order. The outcome for the petitioner depends entirely on the terms of the common order in the Pravat Kumar Choudhury batch, which is referenced but not reproduced here. It would be inaccurate to characterise this order, standing alone, as a decision in favour of either the Assessee or the Department.

Related Case Laws

No directly on-point case notes are currently published on this site.

Case Details

  • Court: High Court of Orissa at Cuttack
  • Case No.: W.P.(C) No.28112 of 2023
  • CNR: Not available
  • Coram: Acting Chief Justice Dr. B.R. Sarangi and Justice Murahari Sri Raman
  • Decision Date: 08.11.2023
  • Disposal Nature: Disposed of in terms of a common GST order

Link to Download the Order

Download the full judgment (PDF)

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.