Facts
of the Case
Omnipresent
Credits Private Limited was one of the petitioners in a batch of writ petitions
challenging reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2015–16.
The
reassessment notices were issued after the expiry of four years from the end of
the relevant assessment year. The sanction for initiation of reassessment
proceedings was granted by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax. The Revenue
sought to justify the initiation of proceedings by relying upon the extensions
granted under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain
Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA), which was enacted in the backdrop of the COVID-19
pandemic.
Issues Involved
Whether
reassessment notices issued under Section 148 after the expiry of the prescribed
period are valid when the mandatory sanction under Section 151 of the Income
Tax Act has been granted by an authority not specified under law, and whether
TOLA alters or relaxes the statutory requirement regarding the competent
sanctioning authority.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The
petitioner contended that sanction under Section 151 is a jurisdictional
precondition for initiation of reassessment proceedings. Since the notices were
issued beyond the statutory period, approval was mandatorily required from the
Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner / Principal Commissioner /
Commissioner, and not from the Joint Commissioner.
It was
further argued that TOLA merely extended time limits for completion of
statutory actions and did not amend or dilute the substantive requirement
regarding the authority competent to grant sanction. Reliance was placed on
judicial precedents, including Twylight Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Ganesh
Das Khanna, and Siemens Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., holding that
reassessment proceedings initiated without approval from the specified
authority are void ab initio.
Respondent’s Arguments
The
Revenue contended that in view of the extensions granted under TOLA, the
reassessment notices were validly issued and that approval by the Joint
Commissioner was sufficient. It was argued that since the limitation period
stood extended, sanction under Section 151(2) as it existed prior to the
Finance Act, 2021, would apply.
The
respondents also relied upon CBDT instructions and administrative
clarifications to contend that the reassessment proceedings were legally
sustainable.
Court Order / Findings
The
Delhi High Court allowed the writ petitions and quashed the impugned
reassessment notices.
The
Court held that Section 151 mandates approval by the specified authority
depending upon the time elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year.
Where reassessment is sought to be initiated beyond the prescribed period,
sanction by higher authorities alone is permissible.
The
Court categorically held that TOLA does not amend or override Section 151 and
only extends the time available for completing statutory actions. It does not
alter the identity of the competent authority required to grant sanction.
Since
the approval in the present case was granted by the Joint Commissioner, who was
not the competent specified authority, the reassessment notices were held to be
without jurisdiction and unenforceable in law.
Important Clarification
The
Court clarified that sanction under Section 151 is not a procedural formality
but a substantive jurisdictional safeguard. Reassessment proceedings initiated
without approval from the legally prescribed specified authority are void ab
initio. Extensions granted under TOLA or reliance on CBDT instructions cannot
cure defects arising from lack of jurisdiction or non-compliance with statutory
mandates.
Link
to download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1770194455_OMNIPRESENTCREDITSPRIVATELIMITEDVsINCOMETAXOFFICERWARD191ANR..pdf
Disclaimer
This
content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only.
Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It
is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The
author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this
content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment