Facts of the
Case
Religare Enterprises Ltd., as successor-in-interest
of RGAM Capital India Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging reassessment
proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department in the name of RGAM Capital
India Ltd., which had ceased to exist pursuant to a duly approved scheme of
amalgamation.
The scheme of arrangement had been sanctioned by
the National Company Law Tribunal, resulting in dissolution of the amalgamating
company without winding up. The factum of amalgamation was duly intimated to
the Assessing Officer along with merged financial statements and revised
returns.
Despite having knowledge of the amalgamation, the
Revenue issued notices and continued reassessment proceedings in the name of
the amalgamating company. The petitioner contended that such action was without
jurisdiction and void in law.
Issues
Involved
- Whether assessment or reassessment proceedings initiated in the
name of an amalgamating company are valid in law.
- Whether issuance of notices to a non-existent entity constitutes a
jurisdictional defect.
- Whether such defect can be cured by invoking Section 292B of the
Income-tax Act, 1961.
- Whether Sections 159 or 170 of the Act save proceedings initiated
against a dissolved entity.
- Applicability of the Supreme Court decision in Mahagun Realtors
(P) Ltd. to such cases.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The petitioner submitted that upon approval of the
scheme of amalgamation, RGAM Capital India Ltd. stood dissolved by operation of
law and ceased to exist as a juristic person. Consequently, any notice or
reassessment proceedings initiated in its name were a nullity.
It was contended that the issue is no longer res
integra and is conclusively settled by the Supreme Court in Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and Spice Entertainment Ltd.,
which categorically held that assessments framed against non-existent entities
are void ab initio and cannot be cured under Section 292B.
The petitioner further argued that participation by
the successor entity does not confer jurisdiction and there can be no estoppel
against law.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The Revenue contended that issuance of notices in
the name of the amalgamating company was a procedural defect curable under Section
292B of the Act. Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court decision in Mahagun
Realtors (P) Ltd. to argue that proceedings could be continued against the
successor entity.
It was also argued that Sections 159 and 170 of the
Act provide statutory support for sustaining proceedings in cases of
succession.
Court Order
/ Findings
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and
quashed the impugned reassessment proceedings. The Court held that:
Upon amalgamation, the
amalgamating company ceases to exist in the eyes of law.
Issuance of notices or
continuation of proceedings in the name of a non-existent entity is a
substantive jurisdictional defect.
Such a defect is not procedural
and cannot be cured by invoking Section 292B of the Act.
Sections 159 and 170 do not
validate proceedings initiated against an entity which had already ceased to
exist.
The decision in Mahagun
Realtors does not dilute the binding ratio of Maruti Suzuki and Spice
Entertainment and is confined to its peculiar facts.
The Court emphasized the importance of certainty,
uniformity, and consistency in tax administration and followed settled Supreme
Court jurisprudence.
Important
Clarification
The judgment conclusively clarifies that:
Assessment or reassessment
proceedings initiated in the name of an amalgamating company are void ab
initio.
Jurisdictional defects arising
from the non-existence of the assessee cannot be cured under Section 292B.
Participation by the successor
entity does not validate proceedings initiated without jurisdiction.
Revenue authorities must
mandatorily issue notices in the name of the amalgamated entity once
amalgamation is duly intimated.
This decision further consolidates and strengthens
the settled law governing reassessment proceedings in cases of corporate
restructuring and amalgamation.
Link to download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1770202983_RELIGAREENTERPRISESLTDASSUCCESSORININTERESTOFRGAMCAPITALINDIALTD.VsASSISTANTCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXANR..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment