Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign
Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015
Sections 44 and 45
Penalty Provisions – Statutory
Exclusions, Monetary Thresholds and ESOP Amendment
1. Overview:-The Black Money
(Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (“the
Act”) is a stringent fiscal statute designed to deter and penalise deliberate
concealment of foreign income and assets by residents. At the same time, the
legislature has consciously incorporated specific exclusions and monetary
thresholds to prevent penal consequences in cases involving low-value holdings,
non-income-generating assets and contingent interests.
The penalty framework under the
Act is primarily governed by Section 44 and Section 45, which must be read
together and harmoniously, keeping in view the object and scope of the
legislation.
2. Section 44 – Penalty for
Failure to Furnish Information
Section 44 provides for a fixed
penalty of ₹10,00,000 where a resident assessee fails to furnish, or furnishes
inaccurate particulars of, foreign income or foreign assets in the return of
income.
However, the provision is subject
to express statutory carve-outs, which exclude certain categories of foreign
assets from the ambit of penalty, even in cases of non-disclosure.
3. Statutory Exclusions under
Section 44
3.1 Foreign Bank Accounts – Low
Balance Exclusion
No penalty under Section 44 shall
be leviable in respect of a foreign bank account where:
• the aggregate balance does not
exceed ₹5,00,000 at any time during the previous year, and
• no income has accrued or arisen
from such account.
This exclusion recognises that
dormant or low-balance accounts, which do not yield income, do not constitute
tax-evasive assets.
3.2 Foreign Shares and Financial
Interests – Low Value Protection
Penalty under Section 44 is also
not attracted in respect of foreign shares, securities or other financial
interests where:
• the aggregate value does not
exceed ₹5,00,000, and
• no income has arisen from such
holdings during the relevant previous year.
This relief covers passive
investments, minority shareholdings and similar low-value foreign financial
interests.
4. ESOPs – Legislative Amendment
and Rationalisation
4.1 Background
Foreign Employee Stock Option
Plans (ESOPs) are typically contingent, illiquid and incapable of real-time
valuation, particularly at the stage of grant or vesting. Under the earlier
interpretation, even such notional interests were exposed to severe penalties,
leading to disproportionate hardship.
4.2 Post-Amendment Position
The law has since been
rationalised to provide that no penalty under Section 44 shall be levied for
non-disclosure of foreign ESOPs where:
the ESOPs are not exercised,
no income has arisen during the
relevant previous year, and
the aggregate value does not
exceed ₹5,00,000.
Accordingly, mere grant or vesting
of ESOPs, without any income event or realisable value, does not attract
penalty under the Act.
Unexercised options:-No penalty
Exercise with undisclosed
income:Penalty may arise
Value exceeding ₹5 lakh
Section 45 – Penalty for
Undisclosed Foreign Income and Asset
Section 45 provides for a penalty
equal to three times the tax payable in cases involving undisclosed foreign
income or assets.
This provision applies only where:
there exists an undisclosed
foreign income or asset, and
such income or asset is chargeable
to tax under the Act
0 Comments
Leave a Comment