Facts of the Case

This is a government tender dispute with no GST content. Ferro Concrete Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. filed Writ Petition No. 100625 of 2023 (GM-TEN) before the Dharwad Bench of the Karnataka High Court against the Tungabhadra Board and its Superintending Engineer, challenging the rejection of its technical bid for Tender Nos. 92/2022-23 and 93/2022-23 (2nd call) relating to maintenance and rehabilitation works at the Tungabhadra Dam. The tender was eventually awarded to a private respondent, Raghava Construction India Pvt. Ltd.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the rejection of the petitioner's technical bid was arbitrary, biased, or lacking qualitative evaluation by experts.
  2. Whether the Tungabhadra Board acted reasonably and within the bounds of fairness expected of a public authority awarding a contract.

Petitioner's Arguments

  • The petitioner argued that the rejection of its technical bid lacked proper qualitative evaluation and was arbitrary and biased in favour of the successful bidder.

Respondent's Arguments

  • The Tungabhadra Board and the successful bidder defended the technical bid evaluation process and the resulting award of the tender to Raghava Construction.

Court Order / Findings

  • Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum held that the impugned decision lacked qualitative evaluation by experts and suffered from arbitrariness affected by bias.
  • The Court noted that the successful bidder's own furnished documents related to maintenance of canals, yet it was awarded a project relating to maintenance and rehabilitation of the Tungabhadra Dam, supporting the finding of an unreasonable and improper award.
  • The Court held the Tungabhadra Board's decision suffered from illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety, and constituted misuse of its statutory powers.
  • The writ petition was allowed; the rejection of the petitioner's technical bid and the consequent award of the tender to the successful respondent were quashed.
  • The respondents were directed to re-do the entire tender process in accordance with law, bearing in mind the Court's observations.

Important Clarification

This is a straightforward government-procurement ruling on arbitrary bid rejection and improper tender evaluation — it has no bearing whatsoever on GST law and offers no GST-related guidance.

Sections Involved

  • Tender conditions and evaluation criteria under the Tungabhadra Board's procurement rules.
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India (judicial review of arbitrary State action in contract award).

Decision – In Favour of

Decided in favour of the petitioner (Ferro Concrete Construction); the writ petition was allowed, the bid rejection and tender award were quashed, and the entire tender process was ordered to be redone.

Case Details

Court: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
Case No.: Writ Petition No. 100625 of 2023 (GM-TEN)
Coram: Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum
Date: Heard and reserved 22.06.2023; decided 06.07.2023
Parties: Ferro Concrete Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Tungabhadra Board & Others

Link to Download the Order

Click here to view/download the full order

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.