Facts of the Case
The assessee deposited ₹12,46,000 during the demonetization
period in his Canara Bank account. Despite issuance of multiple notices, he did
not respond during assessment proceedings. Consequently, the Assessing Officer
added ₹16,41,000 (cash deposits during the year) as unexplained money under
section 69A and ₹54,91,837 (cheque/RTGS credits) under section 68, assessing
total income at ₹71,32,837.
On appeal, the CIT(A), NFAC granted several opportunities
including video conference notices, but due to repeated adjournments and
absence of submissions, the appeal was decided ex parte and the additions were
confirmed.
Issues Involved
- Whether
additions for cash deposits during demonetization are sustainable when
compliance details were filed on the designated portal.
- Whether
bank credits can be taxed without verifying their nature, including
business receipts and inter-bank transfers.
- Whether
appellate authorities must consider written submissions even if the
assessee does not attend hearings.
- Whether
ex-parte disposal without examining available material violates principles
of natural justice.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The assessee submitted that he was an elderly person engaged
in running community centers and had filed details of cash receipts through the
“Cash Transaction-2016” compliance facility, including names and addresses of
persons from whom cash was received.
It was argued that deposits represented business receipts
consistent with turnover of about ₹34.83 lakh during the year. He further
contended that a significant portion of bank credits comprised contra entries,
inter-bank transfers, or loan funds, not taxable income.
Respondent’s Arguments
The Revenue emphasized persistent non-compliance before both
the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), arguing that failure to explain the
sources justified additions under sections 68 and 69A. It also submitted that
if another opportunity were granted, strict directions for full compliance
should be imposed.
Court Order / Findings (ITAT Allahabad)
The Tribunal observed that the assessee had submitted details
of demonetization deposits on the official compliance portal, including
particulars of persons from whom cash was received. These facts did not appear
to have been examined by the Assessing Officer.
On Nature of Bank Credits
It was noted that the Assessing Officer had made additions
without conducting enquiries with the bank to ascertain the nature of credits,
such as business receipts, loans, or inter-account transfers. If the assessee’s
claims were correct, many entries might not represent taxable income.
On Appellate Proceedings
The Tribunal held that even if the assessee failed to attend
video conferencing, the CIT(A) was obligated to consider written submissions
and documentary evidence already on record. Failure to do so resulted in denial
of effective hearing.
Direction for Fresh Assessment
Considering the need for proper factual determination, the
Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer with directions to:
- Examine
submissions made on the compliance portal
- Verify
the nature of bank credits through appropriate enquiries
- Consider
documents filed before the CIT(A) and the Tribunal
- Pass
a fresh order in accordance with law
Important Clarification
The Tribunal clarified that additions for unexplained money or
credits cannot be sustained solely due to non-compliance when relevant
information is already available on departmental systems. Authorities must
examine such material before determining tax liability.
Link to download the order –
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1771066329_SACHIDANANDRAILUCKNOWVS.ITO14BHADOHI.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment