Facts of the
Case
The assessee’s case was selected for compulsory
scrutiny assessment, and notice under Section 143(2) was issued. Subsequently,
the Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 143(3).
The assessee challenged the validity of the
scrutiny proceedings on the ground that the case was selected in violation of
mandatory CBDT Instructions governing compulsory scrutiny selection and
approval requirements.
It was contended that the Assessing Officer lacked
jurisdiction to initiate scrutiny proceedings due to non-compliance with
prescribed conditions.
Issues Involved
- Whether compulsory scrutiny proceedings were validly initiated.
- Whether absence of mandatory approval and conditions rendered the
proceedings without jurisdiction.
- Whether the assessment framed pursuant to such proceedings was
sustainable in law.
Petitioner’s
(Assessee’s) Arguments
- The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny without satisfying
mandatory conditions under CBDT Instructions.
- Required approvals from competent authority were not obtained.
- Therefore, issuance of notice under Section 143(2) itself was
invalid.
- An assessment framed without jurisdiction is void ab initio.
Respondent’s (Revenue’s) Arguments
- The Assessing Officer acted within statutory powers to scrutinize
the return.
- The assessment order was passed after examination of records.
- Procedural lapses, if any, did not invalidate the assessment.
Court Order
/ Findings (ITAT)
- The prescribed conditions for compulsory scrutiny were not
fulfilled.
- Mandatory approval from the competent authority had not been
obtained.
- CBDT Instructions issued under Section 119 are binding on tax
authorities.
Important
Clarification by the Tribunal
- Jurisdictional defects cannot be cured by subsequent proceedings.
- Compliance with CBDT Instructions is mandatory, not procedural
formality.
- Assessments initiated without lawful authority are void.
- Tax administration must adhere strictly to statutory and
administrative safeguards.
Link to download the order –
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment