Facts of the
Case
The assessee company was engaged in the business of
operating a cinema hall. During scrutiny assessment proceedings under Section
143(3), the Assessing Officer examined investments made in the cinema project.
Based on statements recorded and certain information gathered during inquiry proceedings under Sections 131 and 133(6), the Assessing Officer concluded that the assessee had made additional investments not recorded in the books of account.
Issues Involved
- Whether the Assessing Officer was justified in treating the alleged
excess investment as unexplained under Section 69.
- Whether additions based primarily on statements without
corroborative evidence were sustainable.
- Whether proper opportunity and verification were provided during
assessment proceedings.
Petitioner’s (Assessee’s) Arguments
- The addition was made solely on the basis of statements without
supporting documentary evidence.
- No independent verification establishing unaccounted investment was
carried out.
- The assessment violated principles of natural justice.
Respondent’s (Revenue’s) Arguments
- Statements recorded during inquiry proceedings indicated higher
investment than disclosed.
- The assessee failed to satisfactorily explain discrepancies noted
by the Assessing Officer.
- Therefore, addition under Section 69 was justified.
Court Order / Findings (ITAT)
- The addition was primarily based on statements and assumptions.
- No reliable corroborative evidence was produced to establish actual
unexplained investment.
- Documentary records maintained by the assessee were not disproved.
Important
Clarification by the Tribunal
- Additions under Section 69 require concrete evidence of undisclosed
investment.
- Statements recorded during inquiry must be supported by documentary
proof.
- Suspicion or inference cannot substitute proof in taxation
proceedings.
- Proper evaluation of books of account is essential before making
additions.
Link to
download the order -
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment