Facts of the Case

Ashoka Construction, engaged in civil construction/contract activities, was subjected to scrutiny assessment by the Assessing Officer. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer examined the books of account, receipts, expenses, and financial transactions of the assessee.

Being dissatisfied with the explanations and supporting documents furnished, the Assessing Officer made additions to the declared income, treating certain expenses, receipts, or financial entries as not properly substantiated.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the assessment order and sustained the additions. Aggrieved by the appellate decision, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Agra Bench.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the additions made to the business income were legally sustainable.
  2. Whether the assessee had adequately substantiated its accounts and financial transactions.
  3. Whether the rejection of books of account or estimation of income (if any) was justified.
  4. Whether the CIT(A) correctly appreciated the facts and evidence.

Petitioner’s Arguments (Assessee)

  • The additions were arbitrary and not supported by reliable evidence.
  • Proper books of account were maintained and produced.
  • The Assessing Officer failed to appreciate the practical realities of the construction business.
  • Expenses and receipts were genuine and supported by records.
  • The appellate authority erred in sustaining the additions without independent evaluation.

Respondent’s Arguments (Department)

  • The assessee failed to satisfactorily explain discrepancies or deficiencies noted in the accounts.
  • Supporting evidence was inadequate or unreliable.
  • The Assessing Officer was justified in making additions based on the material available.
  • The CIT(A) rightly confirmed the assessment order.

Court Order / FINDINGS (ITAT)

  • Additions to business income must be supported by cogent reasons and evidence.
  • Where books of account are relied upon, their rejection must comply with statutory provisions.
  • Estimation of income in contractor cases cannot be arbitrary and must have a rational basis.
  • The burden lies on the assessee to substantiate entries; however, tax authorities must also justify the basis for additions.

Important Clarification by the Tribunal

  • In civil construction business, fluctuations in receipts and expenses are common and must be examined contextually.
  • Additions cannot be sustained merely on suspicion or generalized assumptions.
  • Proper documentation remains essential for substantiating business transactions.

 Link to download the order –

https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1615963522-ITA%2066%20of%202019%20Ashoka%20Construction.pdf

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.