Facts of the Case
The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) in the case of Shri Abdul Mannan. The dispute arose from additions
made by the Assessing Officer treating certain amounts as unexplained
investments/money under the provisions of Sections 69/69A of the Income-tax
Act, 1961.
Issues Involved
Whether the additions made by the Assessing Officer under
Sections 69/69A on account of alleged unexplained investments or money were
justified when the assessee had furnished an explanation regarding the source
of such amounts.
Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)
- The
assessee failed to satisfactorily explain the nature and source of the
investments/money
- Documentary
evidence furnished was insufficient to establish the genuineness of the
explanation
- Therefore,
the Assessing Officer rightly treated the amounts as unexplained income
Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)
- A
reasonable and plausible explanation regarding the source of the funds had
been provided
- Relevant
supporting material was furnished before the authorities
- The
Revenue did not conduct proper inquiry nor bring adverse evidence on
record
- Hence,
the addition was unjustified
Court Order / Findings
- The
assessee had offered an explanation regarding the source of the amounts in
question
- The
Assessing Officer failed to bring cogent evidence to disprove the
explanation
- Additions
under Sections 69/69A cannot be sustained merely on suspicion or
conjecture
Important Clarification
- The
burden of proof shifts to the Revenue once the assessee provides a
reasonable explanation
- Additions
for unexplained investments require positive evidence
- Taxation
cannot be based on presumptions alone
Link to download the order – https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1560148781-MANNAN-241.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment