Facts of the
Case
The Revenue filed
multiple appeals against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
concerning Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 relating to M/s GTM Builders
& Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and connected entities/persons. The assessee was
engaged in real estate development.
A search and
seizure operation was conducted on the GTM Group on 12 December 2006, following
which proceedings under Section 153A were initiated. The Assessing Officer (AO)
made several additions, including:
- Addition of ₹5.34 crore on account of
alleged bogus share application money
- Addition of ₹1.92 crore on account of
alleged cash received from a housing society
- Additions relating to alleged cash
components in land purchases
- Additions for unexplained investments,
advertisement expenditure, and jewellery stock
Issues Involved
- Whether additions under Sections 68
and 69 could be sustained based on seized documents and statements without
corroborative evidence.
- Whether share application money and
financial transactions were genuine and supported by documentary proof.
- Whether alleged cash payments in
property transactions could be presumed without concrete evidence.
- Scope of High Court interference with
factual findings of the ITAT under Section 260A.
Petitioner’s (Revenue’s) Arguments
The Revenue argued that the ITAT erred in deleting additions despite seized material and statements indicating accommodation entries and unexplained investments. It contended that the assessee had failed to establish genuineness and creditworthiness of share applicants and that incriminating documents showed unaccounted cash transactions in land purchases and dealings with housing societies.
Respondent’s (Assessee’s) Arguments
The assessee
maintained that all transactions were duly supported by documentary evidence,
including confirmations, PAN details, bank records, and agreements. It argued
that most share application funds were received through banking channels and,
in several cases, later refunded.
Regarding alleged cash components and housing society transactions, the assessee contended that there was no proof of actual payment of cash and that the additions were based merely on assumptions.
Court Order / Findings
- The ITAT had thoroughly examined the
evidence and recorded factual findings regarding identity, genuineness,
and creditworthiness of share applicants.
- Many amounts received as share
application money were refunded or adjusted, undermining the allegation of
accommodation entries.
- Alleged cash components in land
purchases were not supported by corroborative evidence; seized documents
contained estimates rather than proof of payment.
- Additions relating to housing
societies were based on presumptions without evidence of actual cash
receipt by the assessee.
- Advertisement expenditure was recorded
in books and paid through banking channels.
- Jewellery stock belonged to a separate
incorporated entity, and no basis existed to tax it in the assessee’s
hands.
Important Clarification
The judgment
reiterates that additions in search assessments must be founded on credible
evidence and cannot rest on suspicion, conjecture, or uncorroborated
statements. It also underscores the limited scope of High Court review over
factual determinations made by the Tribunal.
This ruling is
particularly significant for real estate developers and corporate taxpayers
facing search-based assessments involving alleged cash components and
accommodation entries.
Link to download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1772177385_PRINCIPALCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAXCENTRAL3VsMSGTMBUILDERANDPROMOTERSPVT.LTD..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment