Facts of the Case
The Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT) which had deleted disallowances made by the Assessing Officer
in respect of provisions for unsettled claims and “Incurred But Not Reported”
(IBNR) claims of the respondent insurance company (formerly Religare Health
Insurance Co. Ltd., now Care Health Insurance Ltd.).
For the relevant assessment years, the Assessing Officer
treated these provisions as contingent liabilities and disallowed them under
Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) and the ITAT allowed the claims, leading to the present appeal before
the Delhi High Court.
Issues Involved
- Whether
provisions for unsettled outstanding insurance claims constitute
contingent liabilities or allowable deductions.
- Whether
provisions for IBNR claims—claims incurred but not yet reported—are
deductible under the Income Tax Act.
- Applicability
of actuarial principles and IRDA regulations in determining insurance
liabilities for tax purposes.
Petitioner’s (Revenue’s) Arguments
The Revenue contended that both provisions represented
contingent liabilities because the actual amounts payable were uncertain and
subject to future adjudication. It argued that such provisions were based on
estimates and therefore could not be allowed as deductions in the year of
creation.
The Revenue further asserted that IBNR provisions were ad hoc
in nature and should be allowed only when claims materialize.
Respondent’s (Assessee’s) Arguments
The assessee argued that the provision for unsettled claims
was based on actual claims lodged by policyholders, supported by customer-wise
data. Although final quantification might occur later, the liability had
already arisen when the claim was filed.
Regarding IBNR claims, the assessee submitted that these
provisions were mandated by IRDA regulations and were computed using scientific
actuarial methods by appointed actuaries. Therefore, they represented
ascertained liabilities rather than contingent ones.
Court Order / Findings
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeals and
upheld the Tribunal’s decision in favour of the assessee.
On Unsettled Claims:
The Court held that once claims are lodged by policyholders, the insurer incurs
a present obligation. The fact that verification or quantification occurs later
does not render the liability contingent. The provision was based on actual
data and therefore constituted an ascertained liability.
On IBNR Claims:
The Court emphasized that IBNR reserves are computed using actuarial principles
under statutory IRDA regulations. These estimates are derived from empirical
data and predictive methodologies, reflecting liabilities already incurred
though not yet reported.
The Court relied on the Supreme Court decision in Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT, which recognized that provisions based on reliable estimation of obligations arising from past events are allowable deductions. It also referred to precedents recognizing that liabilities may accrue even if payment is deferred to a future date.
- A
provision is allowable if it represents a present obligation arising from
past events.
- Reliable
estimation based on historical data or actuarial methods is sufficient.
- Insurance
claim provisions mandated by regulatory frameworks cannot be treated as
contingent liabilities merely because precise quantification is pending.
Important Clarification
The judgment clarifies that for insurance companies, statutory
and actuarially determined provisions for claims—including IBNR
reserves—constitute legitimate business liabilities. Such provisions reflect
obligations already incurred and are not disallowed merely due to uncertainty
in exact quantum.
This ruling has significant implications for insurers,
confirming that regulatory compliance and scientific estimation methods are key
determinants in recognizing deductible liabilities under tax law.
Link to download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1772177547_PRINCIPALCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX1VsMSCAREHEALTHINSURANCELIMITEDEARLIERKNOWNASMSRELIGAREHEALTHINSURANCECO.LTD..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment