Facts of the Case
The petitioners had filed their returns of income
for Assessment Years 2016-17 and 2017-18, which were processed under Section
143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Subsequently, following the judgment of the Supreme
Court in Union of India vs Ashish Agarwal, the Income Tax Department
issued notices under Section 148A(b) alleging that certain income had escaped
assessment.
After considering the replies submitted by the
petitioners, the Assessing Officer passed orders under Section 148A(d) and
issued consequential reassessment notices under Section 148.
The petitioners challenged the validity of the
reassessment proceedings before the Delhi High Court, contending that the
notices were issued without obtaining approval from the correct specified
authority as mandated under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act.
Issues Involved
- Whether reassessment notices issued under Section 148 are valid
when approval is obtained from an authority not specified under Section
151 of the Income Tax Act.
- Whether the requirement of prior approval from the specified
authority under the proviso to Section 148 read with Section 151 is
mandatory.
- Whether reassessment proceedings initiated without approval from
the correct authority are liable to be quashed.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The reassessment proceedings were initiated after more than three
years from the end of the relevant assessment year.
- Under Section 151(ii), approval for issuing notice in such cases
must be obtained from the Principal Chief Commissioner / Principal
Director General / Chief Commissioner / Director General.
- However, the approval had been obtained only from the Principal
Commissioner, which is not the prescribed authority for cases beyond three
years.
- Therefore, the impugned orders under Section 148A(d) and notices
under Section 148 were issued without valid sanction and were liable to be
set aside.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The reassessment proceedings were initiated in accordance with the
provisions of the Income Tax Act.
- Reliance was placed on the Taxation
and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020
(TOLA) and CBDT Instruction No. 1/2022 dated 11.05.2022.
- It was submitted that the requirement of approval should not
invalidate the proceedings in the present circumstances.
- The Revenue also sought liberty to initiate fresh proceedings if
the notices were quashed.
Court Findings
- The proviso to Section 148 clearly mandates prior approval from the specified authority before issuance
of reassessment notice.
- Section 151 specifies the competent authority depending on the time elapsed since the relevant
assessment year.
- Where more than three years have elapsed, approval must be granted
by authorities mentioned under Section
151(ii).
- In the present batch of cases, the approval had been obtained from
authorities mentioned under Section
151(i) instead of the authority prescribed under Section 151(ii).
- Such approval does not satisfy the statutory requirement under the
Act.
Court Order
- The reassessment notices and orders issued under Sections 148A(d) and 148 were invalid.
- The notices were quashed
due to absence of approval from the correct specified authority under
Section 151(ii).
Important Clarification by the Court
- Approval from the correct
specified authority is a mandatory statutory requirement.
- The authority granting approval must correspond with the time limitation framework under Section
149 and Section 151.
- Any reassessment initiated without approval from the competent authority
will be legally unsustainable.
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS05012024CW165242022_114311.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared
strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should
independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended
to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the
organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The
material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment