Facts of the Case
The petitioners filed several writ petitions
challenging reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for
Assessment Years 2016-17 and 2017-18.
The petitioners had originally filed their returns
of income which were processed by the department and intimation was issued
under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961. Later, the Revenue issued notices under Section 148A(b) alleging that certain
income had escaped assessment.
After considering the replies submitted by the
assessees, the Assessing Officer passed orders under Section 148A(d) holding that income had escaped assessment and
subsequently issued reassessment notices under Section 148.
The petitioners challenged these actions before the
High Court on the ground that the reassessment proceedings were initiated
without obtaining approval from the “specified
authority” as required under Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Issues Involved
- Whether reassessment notices issued under Sections 148A(d) and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were
valid without approval from the specified
authority under Section 151(ii).
- Whether reassessment proceedings initiated on the basis of approval
from an authority other than the prescribed authority could be sustained
in law.
- Whether the Revenue could rely upon the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain
Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) and CBDT instructions to justify the
reassessment notices.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The reassessment proceedings were invalid as prior approval from the “specified
authority” mandated under Section 151(ii) was not obtained.
- The orders under Section
148A(d) and consequential notices under Section 148 were issued by relying on approval from an
authority not prescribed by law.
- The statutory requirement under Section 151 is mandatory and any
reassessment initiated without such approval is void ab initio.
- The reliance placed by the Revenue on TOLA and CBDT Instruction No.1/2022 could not override the
statutory provisions of the Income Tax Act.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The reassessment proceedings were triggered after the Supreme
Court’s decision in Union of India
v. Ashish Agarwal, which allowed earlier reassessment notices to be
treated as notices under Section 148A(b).
- The orders and notices had been issued after obtaining approval
from the Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax, which according to the Revenue was sufficient
compliance.
- The department relied upon provisions of TOLA and CBDT
Instruction No.1/2022 dated 11.05.2022 to justify the reassessment
process.
Court Order / Findings
- Approval of the “specified authority”
under Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act is mandatory before initiating
reassessment proceedings.
- In the present case, the reassessment notices and orders were
issued without approval of the
prescribed authority, making them legally unsustainable.
- The Court relied upon its earlier judgment in Ganesh Dass Khanna v. Income Tax Officer
while examining the legality of reassessment proceedings.
- Consequently, the impugned
orders under Section 148A(d) and the reassessment notices issued under
Section 148 were quashed.
Important Clarification by the Court
- Compliance with Section
151(ii) is a statutory
pre-condition for reassessment proceedings.
- Approval must be obtained from the “specified authority” as defined under the Income Tax Act,
and approval by any other authority cannot cure the defect.
- Even if reassessment is otherwise permissible, failure to obtain proper approval renders the proceedings invalid in law.
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS05012024CW165242022_114311.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment