Facts of the Case
The petitioners challenged reassessment proceedings
initiated by the Income Tax Department through notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
These notices were issued after the introduction of
the new reassessment regime under the
Finance Act, 2021, which amended the provisions relating to reassessment
under Sections 147 to 151 of the Income-tax Act.
The Revenue contended that the reassessment notices
were valid because the Taxation and
Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA)
extended the limitation period for issuing such notices.
However, the petitioners argued that the notices
were issued without obtaining approval
from the appropriate statutory authority under Section 151, which was a
mandatory requirement under the amended law.
Accordingly, the petitioners approached the Delhi
High Court seeking quashing of the reassessment notices and the consequent
proceedings.
Issues Involved
- Whether reassessment notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are valid when the
mandatory sanction under Section
151 is not obtained from the competent authority.
- Whether the extension of limitation under TOLA, 2020 can override statutory requirements regarding the
competent sanctioning authority.
- Whether reassessment proceedings initiated under the amended
provisions of the Income-tax Act,
1961 complied with mandatory procedural requirements.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The petitioners submitted that the reassessment notices were issued
without obtaining approval from
the competent authority as mandated under Section 151 of the
Income-tax Act.
- It was argued that the extension
of time under TOLA does not alter the statutory requirement regarding
sanction by the specified authority.
- Since the reassessment proceedings were initiated without the
legally required approval, the entire proceedings were without jurisdiction and liable to be
quashed.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The Revenue contended that the reassessment notices were valid
because TOLA extended the limitation
period for issuing notices under Section 148.
- It was argued that the procedural objections raised by the
petitioners should not invalidate the reassessment proceedings.
- The Department also suggested that approval from the specified
authority was not mandatory in the manner contended by the petitioners.
Court Findings
- The statutory framework clearly requires mandatory approval from the specified authority under Section 151
before issuing reassessment notices.
- The argument that such approval was not necessary was contrary to
the scheme of the Act.
- The extension of limitation under TOLA, 2020 does not override or dilute the mandatory procedural requirements
prescribed under the Income-tax Act.
Court Order
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petitions and held that reassessment notices
issued without obtaining proper sanction under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are invalid.
The Court therefore quashed the impugned notices issued under Section 148 and all
consequential reassessment proceedings.
Important Clarification by the Court
- Approval of the specified authority under
Section 151 is mandatory before issuing reassessment
notices.
- The extension of limitation
under TOLA cannot override statutory procedural safeguards
prescribed under the Income-tax Act.
- The provisions of Sections 148, 149, and 151 must be read together, and compliance with the sanction requirement is a jurisdictional condition.
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS05012024CW165242022_114311.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory
guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from
the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of
AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment