Facts of the Case
A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 was conducted by the Investigation Wing on 22.03.2012.
Pursuant to the search, the Assessing Officer issued notice
under Section 153A to the assessee. The assessee submitted that the original
return filed earlier should be treated as the return in response to the notice.
The assessee company was engaged as a 100% Export Oriented
Unit providing remote data entry services to overseas clients.
During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer
observed that the assessee had made foreign remittance of ₹1,16,47,166 to
Singtel Communication Ltd without deducting tax at source.
The assessee contended that no tax was deductible because the
income was not chargeable to tax in India in the hands of the recipient.
However, the Assessing Officer disallowed the amount under
Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS and added the amount to the income
of the assessee.
The CIT(A) deleted the addition relying on the decision of the
Delhi High Court in CIT vs Estel Communications Ltd, holding that bandwidth
connectivity charges do not require deduction of tax at source under Section
195.
Aggrieved by the order, the Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT, and the assessee filed a cross objection challenging the jurisdiction of the addition under Section 153A.
Issues Involved
- Whether
the Assessing Officer can make additions under Section 153A in absence of
incriminating material found during the search.
- Whether
bandwidth connectivity charges paid to a foreign entity require deduction
of tax at source under Section 195.
- Whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) can be made for such payments.
Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)
- The
Assessing Officer was justified in making the addition under Section
40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of tax at source on foreign remittance.
- The
CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition and failed to appreciate the
findings of the Assessing Officer.
- The order of CIT(A) was erroneous both in law and on facts.
Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)
- The
assessment for the relevant year had already been completed and was not
pending at the time of search.
- As
per the judgment of the Delhi High Court in CIT vs Kabul Chawla, no
addition can be made in completed assessments under Section 153A unless
incriminating material is found during search.
- No
incriminating material relating to the impugned disallowance was
discovered during the search.
- Even on merits, the issue is covered by Delhi High Court decision in CIT vs Estel Communications Ltd, where it was held that bandwidth connectivity charges are not liable for TDS under Section 195.
Court Findings
The ITAT observed that the assessment for the relevant year
had already attained finality, as the time limit for issuing notice under
Section 143(2) had expired.
Therefore, the assessment was not pending at the time of the
search.
Relying on the decision of the Delhi High Court in CIT vs
Kabul Chawla (380 ITR 573), the Tribunal held that:
- Completed
assessments can be interfered with under Section 153A only if
incriminating material is found during the search.
The Tribunal noted that:
- The
Revenue could not point out any incriminating material found during the
search relating to the disallowance.
Thus, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was not
sustainable in law.
Further, even on merits, the Tribunal held that the issue was covered by the Delhi High Court judgment in CIT vs Estel Communications Ltd, which held that bandwidth connectivity charges are not liable for TDS under Section 195.
Court Order
- Cross
objection filed by the assessee was allowed.
- Appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
Important Clarification
The Tribunal reiterated the legal principle that:
In completed assessments, additions under Section 153A can
only be made on the basis of incriminating material found during search.
If no such material is discovered, the Assessing Officer cannot disturb the concluded assessment.
Link to download the order - https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1703829639-3129,%203130,%205397%20&%20CO%20386,%20387%20&%20389%20iservices%20Investments%20Ltd..pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment