FACTS OF THE CASE
The petitioner, Garg Candle Works, was registered under GST
since 1st July 2017. The petitioner applied for cancellation of GST
registration on 15th May 2023.
Subsequently, a notice dated 14th June 2023 was issued seeking
submission of documents including Profit & Loss account, pending returns,
and payment of dues. The petitioner did not respond to the said notice,
claiming lack of awareness.
The cancellation application was rejected on 30th April 2024
due to non-submission of required documents and non-payment of dues.
Thereafter, a Show Cause Notice dated 14th May 2024 was issued
proposing cancellation of GST registration on the ground of failure to furnish
returns for a continuous period of six months under Section 39 of the CGST Act,
2017.
The petitioner did not respond to the Show Cause Notice, and the GST registration was cancelled retrospectively with effect from 1st July 2017.
ISSUES INVOLVED
- Whether
GST registration can be cancelled retrospectively on the ground of
non-filing of returns when the assessee had already applied for
cancellation.
- Whether
retrospective cancellation of GST registration from the date of
registration is legally sustainable.
- Whether the impugned order suffers from arbitrariness and lack of proper justification
PETITIONER’S ARGUMENTS
- The
petitioner contended that once an application for cancellation had already
been filed, non-filing of returns thereafter cannot be used as a ground
for retrospective cancellation.
- It
was argued that the Show Cause Notice and subsequent cancellation were
arbitrary and not legally sustainable.
- The retrospective cancellation from 2017 was excessive and without proper basis.
RESPONDENT’S ARGUMENTS
- The
respondent department relied upon the petitioner’s failure to furnish
returns for a continuous period of six months under Section 39 of the CGST
Act, 2017.
- It was contended that due to non-compliance with statutory requirements, cancellation of registration was justified.
COURT’S FINDINGS / ORDER
- The
Delhi High Court observed that the primary ground for cancellation was
non-filing of returns for six months.
- The
Court held that such ground is not sustainable where the petitioner
had already applied for cancellation of GST registration.
- The
Court found that retrospective cancellation from 1st July 2017 was
unjustified.
Order:
- The
impugned order was set aside.
- The
cancellation of GST registration was directed to take effect prospectively
from 14th May 2024.
- It was clarified that other proceedings, if any, under the GST law would remain unaffected.
IMPORTANT CLARIFICATIONS BY THE COURT
- Retrospective
cancellation of GST registration cannot be imposed mechanically without
proper justification.
- Non-filing
of returns cannot be a valid ground when cancellation application is
already pending.
- Authorities must exercise powers reasonably and proportionately while cancelling GST registration.
SECTIONS INVOLVED
- Article
226 & 227 – Constitution of India
- Section
39 – Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Provisions relating to cancellation of GST registration under CGST Act
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/PMS08052025CW61462025_112835.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment