Facts of the Case
The Petitioner, G-Technologies, filed a writ petition
under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging:
- Show
Cause Notice (SCN) dated 22 May 2024 for FY 2019–20
- Consequential
adjudication order dated 11 August 2024
- Certain
GST Notifications issued under Section 168A extending limitation periods
The grievance of the Petitioner was that:
- No
effective opportunity was provided to file a reply to the SCN
- No
personal hearing was granted
- The
adjudication order was passed ex-parte, raising demand and penalties
- The
order was cryptic and non-speaking
Additionally, the Petitioner challenged the validity of Notifications No. 9/2023 and 56/2023 (Central & State Tax), relating to extension of limitation periods under GST law.
Issues Involved
- Whether
an adjudication order passed without granting opportunity of hearing
violates principles of natural justice?
- Whether
ex-parte GST adjudication orders based on non-response to SCN are
sustainable?
- Whether
the validity of Notifications issued under Section 168A of the CGST Act
can be adjudicated when the issue is pending before the Supreme Court?
- Whether relief can be granted independent of the challenge to the vires of notifications?
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The
SCN and adjudication order were passed without providing adequate
opportunity to respond
- No
personal hearing was granted, violating principles of natural justice
- The
order was non-speaking, vague, and arbitrary
- The
Petitioner was unable to file reply due to circumstances beyond control
- The impugned notifications extending limitation were ultra vires Section 168A, as proper GST Council recommendation procedure was not followed
Respondent’s Arguments
- The
taxpayer was given multiple opportunities but failed to respond
- No
reply or appearance was made during adjudication
- The
authority was left with no option but to pass the order and raise demand
- Notifications extending limitation were issued under statutory powers
Court’s Findings / Order
The Delhi High Court held:
- The
Petitioner was not afforded a proper opportunity of hearing
- The
adjudication order was passed without hearing the Petitioner,
violating natural justice
- Even
if opportunities were recorded, effective opportunity must be real and
meaningful
Order:
- Impugned
adjudication order set aside
- Petitioner
allowed to file reply to SCN till 10 July 2025
- Adjudicating
authority directed to:
- Provide
personal hearing
- Pass
a fresh reasoned order after considering submissions
- GST portal access to be restored for compliance
Important Clarification by Court
- The
issue regarding validity of GST Notifications (Section 168A) is kept
open
- Final
outcome shall depend upon:
- Supreme
Court decision in M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of
State Tax & Ors.
- Delhi
High Court proceedings in connected matters
- All
rights and remedies of parties remain open
Sections Involved
- Article
226 & 227 – Constitution of India
- Section
73 – CGST Act, 2017
- Section 168A – CGST Act, 2017 (Extension of time limits)
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68906052025CW157142024_165721.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment