Facts of the Case
The present writ petition was filed by Alaknanda Steel
through its proprietor challenging:
- Show
Cause Notice (SCN) dated 27.05.2024 for FY 2019–20
- Consequential
adjudication order dated 10.08.2024 passed by the Sales Tax Officer
The petitioner also challenged the validity of the following
notifications:
- Notification
No. 9/2023 – Central Tax
- Notification
No. 56/2023 – Central Tax
- Corresponding
State Tax Notifications
The grievance of the petitioner was that:
- No
opportunity was granted to file a reply to the SCN
- No
personal hearing was provided
- The
adjudication order was passed ex parte
- The order was cryptic, vague, and non-speaking
Issues Involved
- Whether
the impugned adjudication order passed without granting an opportunity of
hearing violates principles of natural justice?
- Whether
the petitioner should be granted an opportunity to respond to the SCN?
- What is the effect of the pending challenge to GST Notifications issued under Section 168A of the CGST Act?
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The
adjudication order was passed without granting any opportunity to file a
reply or to be heard
- The
order is non-speaking and lacks reasoning
- There
is a clear violation of principles of natural justice
- The proceedings were conducted ex parte resulting in adverse consequences including demand and penalties
Respondent’s Arguments
- The
order records that no reply or clarification was filed by the petitioner
- The
adjudicating authority proceeded based on available records and SCN
Court’s Findings / Order
The Delhi High Court held:
- The
petitioner was not afforded an opportunity to be heard
- The
adjudication order was passed without considering any reply
- Such
action is in violation of principles of natural justice
Order Passed
- The
impugned adjudication order was set aside
- The
petitioner was granted time till 10 July 2025 to file reply to SCN
- Adjudicating
Authority directed to:
- Provide
personal hearing
- Consider
reply and submissions
- Pass
a fresh reasoned order
- GST portal access to be provided for compliance
Important Clarification by Court
- The
issue regarding validity of GST Notifications (Section 168A) is:
- Kept
open
- Subject
to outcome of pending proceedings before the Supreme Court in:
- M/s
HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors.
- Also subject to decision in related Delhi High Court matters
Sections Involved
- Article
226 & 227 – Constitution of India
- Section
73 – CGST Act (Adjudication of tax liability)
- Section
168A – CGST Act (Power to extend time limits)
- Principles of Natural Justice (Audi Alteram Partem)
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68906052025CW158142024_165852.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment