Facts of the Case
The present matter involves three writ petitions filed by M/s
Bharti Airtel Limited, Indus Towers Limited, and Elevar Digitel
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. challenging proceedings initiated under the Central
Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act).
- Bharti
Airtel challenged:
- Order-in-Original
dated 24 March 2023
- Appellate
order dated 31 May 2024
- Indus
Towers and Elevar Digitel challenged:
- Show
Cause Notices issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act for the
period 01 July 2017 to 31 March 2024
The dispute centered on denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on goods and services used for setting up telecom towers, treating them as immovable property under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act.
Issues Involved
- Whether
telecommunication towers qualify as immovable property under GST
law?
- Whether
ITC is barred under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act on inputs used
in telecom tower infrastructure?
- Whether exclusion of telecom towers from “plant and machinery” automatically makes them immovable property?
Petitioner’s Arguments
- Telecom
towers are movable equipment, capable of being dismantled and
relocated.
- Only
the civil foundation is immovable; towers themselves are not.
- Installation
is done for stability and functionality, not permanence.
- The
issue is no longer res integra in view of:
- Supreme
Court decision in Bharti Airtel Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise,
Pune (2024)
- Delhi
High Court decision in Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd vs Commissioner of
Service Tax (2018)
- These
judgments held:
- Towers
are movable goods
- Eligible
as capital goods/inputs
- ITC cannot be denied
Respondent’s Arguments
- Telecom
towers fall within immovable property due to:
- Their
installation and attachment to earth
- Reliance
placed on:
- Explanation
under Section 17(5) of CGST Act
- Specific
exclusion of telecom towers from “plant and machinery”
- Argument:
- Since towers are excluded from plant & machinery, they must be treated as immovable property → ITC blocked
Court Findings / Order
The Delhi High Court rejected the department’s
contention and held:
1. Telecom Towers are Movable Property
- Applying
Supreme Court judgment in Bharti Airtel (2024):
- Towers
fail the tests of immovable property, including:
- Permanency
test
- Annexation
test
- Functionality
test
- Marketability
test
- Towers:
- Can
be dismantled and relocated
- Are
not permanently attached to earth
- Are installed only for operational efficiency
2. Section 17(5)(d) Not Applicable
- Section
17(5)(d) applies only to:
- construction
of immovable property
- Since
telecom towers are not immovable property:
- ITC restriction does not apply
3. Exclusion from “Plant and Machinery” Not
Decisive
- Mere
exclusion of telecom towers from definition of “plant and machinery”:
- Does
NOT automatically classify them as immovable property
- They must independently satisfy tests of immovability — which they fail
Important Clarifications
- Telecom
towers:
- Are
movable goods, not immovable property
- Eligible
for Input Tax Credit
- Attachment
to earth:
- Must
be permanent & for beneficial enjoyment of land to qualify as
immovable
- Stability-based
installation:
- Does not change the nature of goods
Sections Involved
- Section
16 – Eligibility for Input Tax Credit
- Section
17(5)(d) – Blocked Credit (Immovable Property)
- Section
74 – Tax demand for fraud/suppression cases
- Explanation to Section 17(5) – Definition of “Plant and Machinery”
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/YVA12122024CW132112024_164401.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment