Facts of the
Case
The petitioner, engaged in trading household edible
items, had obtained GST registration. Subsequently, the petitioner ceased
business operations in June 2022.
A Show Cause Notice dated 18.07.2022 was issued
alleging non-filing of GST returns. However, the notice:
- Did not specify date, time, or venue for hearing
- Did not mention the name/designation of the issuing officer
Later, an order dated 12.10.2022 cancelled the
petitioner’s GST registration retrospectively from 08.06.2018, despite:
- Reference to a reply allegedly filed
- Simultaneous statement that no reply was received
- No tax demand (Nil amount mentioned)
Issues
Involved
- Whether GST registration can be cancelled retrospectively without
proper reasoning.
- Whether absence of proper details in Show Cause Notice violates
principles of natural justice.
- Whether retrospective cancellation requires objective satisfaction under law.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
- The Show Cause Notice was defective and vague.
- No opportunity was given to contest retrospective cancellation.
- Retrospective cancellation was arbitrary and unjustified.
- The petitioner had already closed business and did not seek restoration, but objected to retrospective effect.
Respondent’s
Arguments
- The petitioner failed to file GST returns.
- Under statutory provisions, registration can be cancelled
retrospectively.
- Such cancellation may impact Input Tax Credit (ITC) of customers.
Court’s
Findings / Order
The Court held:
- Retrospective cancellation cannot be done mechanically.
- Under law, such cancellation must be based on objective
satisfaction, not mere non-filing of returns.
- Authorities must consider consequences, including impact on Input
Tax Credit of third parties.
- The Show Cause Notice and order were defective and non-speaking,
hence unsustainable.
- The petitioner was not given an opportunity to contest
retrospective effect, violating natural justice.
Final Order
- The cancellation was modified:
- Effective date changed from 08.06.2018 → 18.07.2022 (date
of Show Cause Notice)
- Petitioner directed to comply with statutory requirements
- Authorities allowed to recover dues as per law
Important
Clarification
- Retrospective cancellation must be justified, reasoned, and
intentional.
- Authorities must evaluate impact on third parties (ITC denial)
before passing such orders.
- Defective notices lacking essential details are legally unsustainable.
Sections
Involved
- Section 29(2), Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Cancellation of GST Registration
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/62727022024CW11992024_155119.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment