Facts of the
Case
- Multiple assessees were issued reassessment notices under Section
148.
- The notices were issued after 01.04.2021, following the
amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.
- The alleged escaped income in all cases was below ₹50 lakhs.
- The Revenue relied upon:
- TOLA (COVID-related relaxation)
- CBDT Instruction dated 11.05.2022
- Supreme Court ruling in reassessment-related matters
- Assessees challenged:
- Notices under Section 148
- Orders under Section 148A(d)
- CBDT Instruction
Issues
Involved
- Whether reassessment notices issued under Section 148 after
01.04.2021 are governed by the new limitation regime under Section 149
(post Finance Act, 2021).
- Whether the extended limitation period (up to 10 years)
under Section 149(1)(b) can be invoked where escaped income is less
than ₹50 lakhs.
- Whether TOLA and CBDT Instructions can override statutory
limitation provisions.
- Whether the “travel back in time” theory adopted by Revenue is legally sustainable.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
- Notices are time-barred under Section 149(1)(a), which
prescribes 3 years limitation.
- Since escaped income is below ₹50 lakhs, Section 149(1)(b)
(extended 10 years) is not applicable.
- Finance Act, 2021 introduced a new regime, which must apply
to all notices issued after 01.04.2021.
- TOLA does not permit retrospective extension of limitation
beyond statutory provisions.
- The “travel back in time” theory is:
- Unsupported by statute
- Not recognized by courts
- CBDT Instructions cannot override the Act or judicial precedents.
- Reassessment proceedings violate principles of strict interpretation of taxing statutes.
Respondent’s
Arguments (Revenue)
- Notices are valid due to:
- Extension of limitation under TOLA
- Supreme Court directions treating old notices as valid under new
regime
- Time period should be computed by excluding procedural delays.
- The reassessment notices issued earlier should be treated as revived
and valid.
- CBDT Instruction is intra vires and clarifies applicability
of limitation.
- The limitation should be interpreted harmoniously with TOLA and judicial directions.
Court’s
Findings
- The new regime under Finance Act, 2021 applies to notices
issued after 01.04.2021.
- Section 149(1)(a) clearly provides 3-year limitation for
reopening.
- Section 149(1)(b) (10-year period) applies only when escaped
income ≥ ₹50 lakhs.
- In the present cases:
- Escaped income was below ₹50 lakhs
- Hence, extended limitation cannot be invoked
- The “travel back in time” theory:
- Has no statutory backing
- Is legally unsustainable
- TOLA:
- Cannot override substantive limitation provisions
introduced by Finance Act, 2021
- CBDT Instruction:
- Cannot curtail rights of assessees
- Cannot override statutory law
Court Order
/ Final Decision
- Reassessment notices issued under Section 148 were quashed.
- Orders passed under Section 148A(d) were set aside.
- Revenue was held not entitled to invoke extended limitation.
- All writ petitions were allowed in favour of the assessees.
Important
Clarifications by the Court
- Finance Act, 2021 brought a complete substitution of
reassessment provisions.
- Limitation provisions must be interpreted strictly.
- Executive instructions (CBDT) cannot override statutory
provisions.
- TOLA provides limited procedural relaxation, not substantive
extension of limitation.
- Reassessment beyond limitation violates legal certainty and taxpayer rights.
Link to download the
order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS10112023CW115272022_212005.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment