Facts of the
Case
The present appeal was filed by the Revenue
challenging the order dated 25.03.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2012–13.
The Revenue sought to raise certain questions of
law against the Tribunal’s findings. However, it was brought to the Court’s
notice that identical issues had already been adjudicated in earlier litigation
involving the same assessee for Assessment Year 2010–11.
Further, reliance was placed on a subsequent judgment of the Supreme Court in a connected matter involving cooperative societies engaged in similar activities, wherein the issue had been decided in favour of the assessee.
Issues
Involved
- Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue raises any substantial
question of law under the Income Tax Act.
- Whether issues raised in the present appeal are already covered by earlier judgments of the High Court and the Supreme Court.
Petitioner’s
(Revenue’s) Arguments
- The Revenue challenged the correctness of the ITAT’s order dated
25.03.2022.
- It contended that the Tribunal erred in law and that substantial questions of law arose for consideration by the High Court.
Respondent’s
(Assessee’s) Arguments
- The assessee argued that the issues raised were squarely covered
by the earlier judgment of the Delhi High Court in its own case for AY
2010–11.
- It was further submitted that the Supreme Court, in Principal
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Krishak Bharti Cooperative Ltd. (2023 SCC
OnLine SC 1167), had already decided similar issues in favour of the
assessee.
- Therefore, no fresh adjudication was required as the matter stood settled.
Court’s
Findings / Order
- The Court observed that the issues raised in the present appeal
were already covered against the Revenue by earlier decisions.
- It held that no substantial question of law arose for
consideration.
- Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
- All pending applications were also disposed of.
Important
Clarification
- The Court reaffirmed that where issues are already settled by precedents
of jurisdictional High Court and Supreme Court, filing of repetitive
appeals is unwarranted.
- It emphasized judicial discipline and consistency in tax litigation.
Sections
Involved
- Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Appeal to High Court)
Link to download the order
-https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60807112023ITA6122023_121852.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment