Facts of the
Case
The appeal was
filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT) dated 10.06.2019.
Two primary issues
arose:
- Deletion of disallowance of pre-operative
expenses amounting to ₹5,75,23,000.
- Deletion of addition of ₹3,39,98,656
treated as income from other sources.
The Assessing
Officer (AO) had:
- Disallowed pre-operative expenses
claimed by the assessee.
- Added interest income earned on fixed
deposits under “Income from Other Sources.”
However, the
CIT(A) and ITAT deleted both additions.
Issues Involved
- Whether expenses incurred between setting
up of business and commencement of business are allowable as revenue
expenditure.
- Whether interest income earned on
fixed deposits during project implementation can be set off against
business losses under Section 71.
Petitioner’s (Revenue) Arguments
- Pre-operative expenses should not be
allowed as revenue expenditure.
- Interest income earned on fixed
deposits should be taxed under “Income from Other Sources” without
allowing set-off against business losses.
Respondent’s (Assessee) Arguments
- The business had already been set
up, and therefore expenses incurred thereafter qualify as revenue
expenditure.
- Interest earned on fixed deposits was inextricably
linked to the project execution, and hence eligible for set-off under
Section 71.
- Funds used for fixed deposits were
part of business funds meant for the project.
Court Findings / Order
The Delhi High
Court upheld the ITAT’s decision and ruled:
1.
Pre-operative Expenses
- There is a clear distinction between:
- Setting up of business, and
- Commencement of business
- Expenses incurred between these stages
are revenue in nature.
- The Tribunal correctly upheld the
deletion of disallowance.
- The Court also applied the principle
of consistency, noting that in subsequent years no such disallowance
was made.
2. Interest
Income & Set-off
- It was undisputed that:
- Interest income was declared under
“Income from Other Sources.”
- It was set off against business
losses under Section 71.
- The Court relied on:
- Indian Oil Panipat Power Consortium
Ltd vs ITO
- It held:
- Interest income earned from funds linked
to project setup is eligible for set-off.
- Such funds were inextricably
connected to business activity.
Final Order
- No substantial question of law arose.
- The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
Important Clarification
- Setting up of business ≠ Commencement
of business
Expenses incurred after setup but before commencement are allowable. - Interest Income Treatment
If funds are inextricably linked to business/project, interest income can be: - Set off against business losses
- Not treated purely as independent
“Income from Other Sources”
- Principle of Consistency
- If the department has accepted a
position in subsequent years, deviation without reason is discouraged.
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS25092023ITA882020_170738.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is
shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers
should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not
intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and
the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content.
The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment