Facts of the Case
The present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the Delhi
High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
concerning Assessment Years 2009–10, 2011–12, and 2013–14.
The Tribunal, through its common judgment dated 12.10.2022,
held that no incriminating material was found during the course of search
proceedings relating to the relevant assessment years.
It was also an undisputed fact that the assessments for these
years had already been completed (unabated assessments) prior to the
search.
Issues Involved
- Whether
additions can be made under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
in respect of completed assessments when no incriminating material is
found during search.
- Whether
the Revenue’s appeal raises any substantial question of law.
Relevant Sections Involved
- Section
153A – Assessment in case of search or requisition
- Section
260A – Appeal to High Court
Petitioner’s (Revenue’s) Arguments
- The
Revenue sought to challenge the findings of the ITAT.
- It
filed appeals with a delay of 89 days, which was condoned by the Court.
- However,
even the Revenue fairly conceded that:
- No
incriminating material was found for the relevant assessment years.
- The issue is covered by binding judicial precedents.
Respondent’s Arguments
- None
appeared on behalf of the respondent (assessee).
- The
case was decided based on the record and settled legal position.
Court’s Findings / Order
- The
issue is squarely covered by the judgment in
CIT v. Kabul Chawla (2016) 380 ITR 573 - The
above principle has been affirmed by the Supreme Court in
PCIT v. Abhisar Buildwell
Key Finding:
No addition can be made under Section 153A in respect of
completed assessments in absence of incriminating material found during
search.
- Since
the issue is already settled, no substantial question of law arises.
- Accordingly,
all appeals were dismissed.
Important Clarification
- This
judgment reinforces the principle that Section 153A does not grant
unfettered powers to reassess completed assessments.
- Additions
are strictly dependent on incriminating material found during search.
- The
ruling aligns with consistent jurisprudence protecting taxpayers from
arbitrary reassessment.
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60827072023ITA4032023_120346.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment