Facts of the Case
The present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year 2019–20.
The petitioner, Dhiru Realestates Private Limited, challenged the
validity of proceedings initiated under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act,
1961.
A notice dated 29.03.2023 under Section 148A(b) alleged that
the petitioner had unexplained and undisclosed credit entries amounting to
₹7,26,63,153/- in its bank account.
In response, the petitioner submitted that the information
relied upon by the Revenue was incorrect and that the actual credits in the
bank account were only ₹99,67,272/-.
The Assessing Officer (AO), while passing an order under
Section 148A(d) dated 08.04.2023, accepted that the petitioner’s contention
regarding the incorrect figure was valid. However, the AO proceeded to raise
new allegations regarding unexplained transactions and cash deposits which were
not part of the original notice under Section 148A(b).
Issues Involved
- Whether
the Assessing Officer can introduce new grounds and allegations in an
order passed under Section 148A(d) which were not part of the initial
notice under Section 148A(b).
- Whether
such action violates principles of natural justice.
- Whether
reassessment proceedings can be sustained when the foundational notice
itself is defective or incomplete.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The
petitioner contended that the initial notice under Section 148A(b) was
based on incorrect factual information.
- It
was argued that once the AO accepted that the alleged amount of ₹7.26
crore was incorrect, the very basis of the proceedings ceased to exist.
- The
petitioner further argued that the AO introduced new allegations in the
order under Section 148A(d), including unexplained credits and cash
deposits, which were never put to the petitioner for response.
- This amounted to a violation of the principles of natural justice as no opportunity was given to address these new allegations.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The
Revenue relied on the material available on record and supported the order
passed under Section 148A(d).
- It
was contended that despite correction of the figures, the petitioner
failed to explain certain credit entries and cash deposits.
- The
Revenue justified the reassessment on the ground that income chargeable to
tax had escaped assessment.
Court’s Findings / Order
The Delhi High Court observed:
- The
Assessing Officer acknowledged that the original allegation in the notice
under Section 148A(b) was incorrect.
- Despite
this, the AO proceeded to make fresh allegations in the order under
Section 148A(d), which were not part of the original notice.
- Such
action deprived the petitioner of an opportunity to respond to these new
allegations.
The Court held that:
- The
issues forming the basis of the order under Section 148A(d) were not put
to the petitioner.
- This
constituted a clear violation of principles of natural justice.
Accordingly, the Court set aside the impugned order and
notices, while granting liberty to the Assessing Officer to proceed afresh in
accordance with law.
Important Clarification
- The
Court did not adjudicate on the merits of the alleged escaped income.
- The
decision was confined to procedural legality, particularly adherence to
principles of natural justice.
- The
Revenue retains the liberty to initiate fresh proceedings, provided due
process is followed.
Sections Involved
- Section
148A(b), Income Tax Act, 1961 – Show cause notice before reassessment
- Section
148A(d), Income Tax Act, 1961 – Order deciding whether it is a fit case
for reassessment
- Principles
of Natural Justice (Audi Alteram Partem)
Link to download the order - https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60801062023CW80132023_142559.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment