Facts of the Case

The present writ petition was filed challenging the validity of a notice dated 04.03.2023 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2019–20. The petitioner, a corporate entity, was subjected to reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO).

The petitioner contended that the impugned notice was issued without proper application of mind and contained inconsistencies reflecting a lack of clarity regarding the nature of the assessee and the transaction involved.

 

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the notice issued under Section 148A(b) was valid in law.
  2. Whether reassessment proceedings can be initiated without relevant material indicating income escaping assessment.
  3. Whether the Assessing Officer applied due diligence while issuing the notice.
  4. Applicability of Section 50CA in cases involving investment in shares.

 

Petitioner’s Arguments

  • The notice was issued without application of mind and lacked supporting material to show escapement of income.
  • The allegation pertained to investment in shares, which could not automatically be treated as income chargeable to tax.
  • The AO sought passport details, which is irrelevant as the petitioner is a company, not an individual.
  • The request for a tax residency certificate further reflected confusion regarding the status of the assessee.
  • Section 50CA applies only to transfer of shares and not to investment in shares, making its invocation incorrect.

 

Respondent’s Arguments

  • The Revenue submitted that the appropriate course would be to remit the matter back to the Assessing Officer for conducting a fresh (de novo) assessment exercise based on proper material.

 

Court’s Findings / Order

  • The Court observed that the notice suffered from non-application of mind and procedural defects.
  • The impugned notice and consequential order were set aside.
  • Liberty was granted to the Assessing Officer to initiate fresh proceedings, subject to:
    • Collection of relevant material showing escapement of income
    • Issuance of proper notice
    • Grant of personal hearing
    • Passing of a reasoned speaking order

Important Clarification

  • Reassessment proceedings must be based on tangible material demonstrating income escaping assessment.
  • Notices issued under Section 148A(b) must reflect clear application of mind and correct understanding of facts.
  • Incorrect assumptions about the assessee (individual vs company) can invalidate proceedings.
  • Section 50CA is applicable only to transfer of shares, not mere investment.

 

Sections Involved

  • Section 148A(b) – Procedure before issuing notice for reassessment
  • Section 50CA – Special provision for full value of consideration for transfer of unquoted shares


Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS26052023CW73972023_152439.pdf 

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.