Facts of the Case

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30.07.2021 for Assessment Year 2014-15.

The core dispute revolved around whether the consideration received by the respondent (assessee), a non-resident entity, for providing “centralized services” to its Indian customers was taxable in India as Fee for Technical Services (FTS) or Fee for Included Services (FIS) under the Indo-US DTAA.

Additionally, there was a delay of 300 days in re-filing the appeal, which was condoned by the Court.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the fee received for centralized services qualifies as FTS under the Income Tax Act and DTAA.
  2. Whether such services fall within the definition of FIS under the Indo-US DTAA.
  3. Whether any substantial question of law arises for consideration by the High Court. 

Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)

  • The Revenue contended that the services rendered by the assessee to Indian entities were technical in nature.
  • Accordingly, such receipts should be taxed in India as FTS/FIS under the provisions of the Income Tax Act read with the Indo-US DTAA.
  • The Tribunal’s order was challenged on the ground that it incorrectly interpreted the nature of services and taxability provisions 

Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)

  • The assessee submitted that identical issues had already been decided in its favour in earlier assessment years.
  • It was highlighted that for AY 2015-16, the Delhi High Court (coordinate bench) had already dismissed similar appeals filed by the Revenue (ITA Nos. 435/2022 and 434/2022 dated 04.11.2022).
  • Therefore, the present appeal did not raise any new or substantial question of law.

Court’s Findings / Order

  • The Court noted that the same issue had already been adjudicated in the assessee’s own case for a subsequent assessment year.
  • The earlier decision of the coordinate bench had attained finality, and no distinguishing factors were presented.
  • Consequently, the Court held that no substantial question of law arises in the present appeal.
  • The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed/closed 

Important Clarification

  • The judgment reinforces that consistency in judicial decisions must be maintained when identical issues arise in the same assessee’s case across different assessment years.
  • Where a coordinate bench has already decided the issue, subsequent appeals on identical facts may not be entertained unless new legal grounds exist.
  • It also highlights the principle that mere classification as “centralized services” does not automatically qualify receipts as FTS/FIS, unless the DTAA conditions are satisfied. 

Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60808052023ITA2642023_162915.pdf

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.