Facts of the
Case
- The respondents/assessees (PEC Ltd. and RITES Ltd.) incurred CSR
expenditure during Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15.
- The Assessing Officer disallowed the CSR expenses claimed as
deduction under Section 37(1).
- The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the deduction, holding that
Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) is prospective.
- The Revenue challenged the Tribunal’s decision before the Delhi High Court.
Issues
Involved
- Whether CSR expenditure qualifies as deductible business
expenditure under Section 37(1)?
- Whether Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) is retrospective or
prospective in nature?
- Whether CSR expenditure constitutes application of income or business expenditure?
Petitioner’s
Arguments (Revenue)
- CSR expenditure is not incurred wholly and exclusively for business
purposes.
- Such expenditure represents application of income rather than
business expenditure.
- Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) is clarificatory and should apply retrospectively.
Respondent’s
Arguments (Assessee)
- CSR expenses were incurred in accordance with government guidelines
and in the business interest of the company.
- Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) is prospective and applicable only
from AY 2015-16 onwards.
- For earlier years, CSR expenditure qualifies as allowable deduction under Section 37(1).
Court
Findings / Order
- The High Court upheld the Tribunal’s decision in favour of the
assessee.
- It held that Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) is prospective
and applicable only from 01.04.2015 (AY 2015-16 onwards).
- CSR expenditure incurred prior to this date can be claimed as
deduction if conditions of Section 37(1) are satisfied.
- CBDT Circular dated 21.01.2015 and Finance Bill memorandum clearly
establish prospective applicability.
- The Court rejected the Revenue’s contention and decided the issue in favour of the assessee.
Important
Clarification
- CSR expenditure prior to AY 2015-16 is allowable under
Section 37(1), subject to fulfillment of conditions.
- Post amendment (w.e.f. 01.04.2015), CSR expenditure is not allowable
under Section 37(1), except where covered under Sections 30 to 36.
- CBDT Circulars are binding on the Revenue authorities.
Section
Involved
- Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Explanation 2 to Section 37(1)
- Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/RAS29112022ITA2682022_211737.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment