Facts of the
Case
- The assessees, foreign entities, provided centralized services
to Indian customers, including:
- Sales and marketing
- Loyalty programs
- Reservation services
- Technological and operational services
- Training and human resource services
- The ITAT ruled that such receipts do not qualify as FTS.
- The Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging this finding.
Issues
Involved
- Whether payments received for centralized services constitute Fees
for Technical Services under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act,
1961.
- Whether such services qualify as Fees for Included Services under Article 12(4)(a) of the Indo-US DTAA.
Petitioner’s
Arguments (Revenue)
- The ITAT erred in holding that payments for centralized services
are not FTS.
- Such services involve technical and managerial elements and should
be taxable.
- The reliance placed by ITAT on Director of Income Tax vs Sheraton International Inc. (2009) was challenged, as the Revenue has not accepted the said judgment and has filed an appeal before the Supreme Court.
Respondent’s
Arguments (Assessee)
- The issue is squarely covered by the Delhi High Court
judgment in Sheraton International Inc. (2009).
- The services provided do not “make available” technical knowledge, hence cannot be classified as FTS/FIS.
Court’s
Findings / Order
- The Court observed that:
- The issue is already settled in favour of the assessee by
the earlier judgment in Sheraton International Inc.
- The Revenue failed to distinguish the present case from the
earlier precedent.
- Even though the earlier judgment is under challenge before the
Supreme Court, there is no stay on its operation.
- Relying on Supreme Court rulings in:
- Kunhayammed vs State of Kerala (2000)
- Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. vs Church of South India Trust (1992)
- The Court held that the precedent remains binding.
Result: Appeals dismissed.
Important
Clarification by Court
- The Court clarified that:
- The outcome of the present appeals shall be subject to the
final decision of the Supreme Court in the pending civil appeal
(Civil Appeal No. 3094/2010).
Sections
Involved
- Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Article 12(4)(a) of the Indo-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)
Link to download the
order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/MMH04112022ITA4342022_202752.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools
0 Comments
Leave a Comment