Facts of the
Case
The petitioner, Kamdhenu Enterprises Ltd., filed
the present writ petition challenging reassessment proceedings initiated by the
Income Tax Department. The challenge included notice dated 15 May 2020 issued
under Section 148, a subsequent notice dated 07 June 2021 for the same assessment
year, and the assessment order dated 30 March 2022 along with consequential
demand and penalty notices.
It was contended that two reassessment notices had been issued for the same assessment year and that the assessment order was passed without disposing of objections filed by the petitioner. Further, reliance was placed on a third-party statement which was not provided to the petitioner in a timely manner.
Issues
Involved
- Whether multiple reassessment notices under Section 148 can be
issued for the same assessment year during the pendency of earlier
reassessment proceedings.
- Whether passing an assessment order without disposing of objections
violates settled legal principles.
- Whether failure to provide adequate opportunity to respond to relied-upon material violates principles of natural justice.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
- Two reassessment notices were issued for the same assessment year,
which is impermissible in law.
- The first notice was issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing
Officer, and alternatively, simultaneous reassessment proceedings are not
allowed.
- The assessment order was passed without disposing of objections,
contrary to the law laid down in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs ITO.
- The statement relied upon by the Assessing Officer was not furnished in a timely manner, depriving the petitioner of a fair opportunity to respond.
Respondent’s
Arguments
- The initial notice was issued by the Assessing Officer having
jurisdiction at the relevant time.
- The reassessment notices were based on the same information.
- There was no violation of natural justice as an opportunity of hearing was provided through video conferencing.
Court
Findings / Order
1. Multiple
Reassessment Notices Not Permissible
The Court held that issuance of a second
reassessment notice during the pendency of earlier reassessment proceedings for
the same assessment year is impermissible in law.
2. Reliance
on Precedents
The Court relied on:
- CIT v. Sanjay Kumar Garg
- S.B. Jain v. Mahendra (SC)
- Nilofer Hameed v. ITO
These judgments affirm that fresh reassessment
cannot be initiated when earlier proceedings are still pending.
3.
Non-Disposal of Objections Invalidates Assessment
The Court reiterated that objections must be
disposed of before passing an assessment order, as mandated in GKN
Driveshafts (India) Ltd.
4. Violation
of Natural Justice
Failure to provide adequate opportunity to respond to material relied upon (statement of third party) amounted to violation of natural justice.
Final Order
- Second reassessment notice dated 07 June 2021 and consequential
notices were quashed.
- Assessment order dated 30 March 2022 along with demand and penalty
notices were also quashed.
- Matter remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision after disposing of objections in accordance with law.
Important
Clarification by Court
- Reassessment proceedings cannot be duplicated for the same
assessment year.
- Disposal of objections is a mandatory procedural requirement.
- Adequate opportunity must be given to the assessee to rebut
evidence relied upon by the department.
Sections
Involved
- Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Link to download the
order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/MMH27102022CW85892022_182410.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment