Facts of the Case

The petitioner, MUFG Bank Ltd., filed multiple writ petitions seeking directions against the Income Tax Department for failure to give effect to appellate orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and other judicial authorities.

The petitioner contended that despite favorable orders from:

  • ITAT (dated 21 May 2020, 6 December 2018, and 13 September 2019),
  • Assessment Order dated 18 March 2021, and
  • Calcutta High Court order dated 7 August 2019,

the respondents failed to pass consequential appeal effect orders and release refunds.

The refunds claimed related to multiple assessment years, amounting to substantial sums along with statutory interest under Section 244A and additional interest under Section 244A(1A).

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the Income Tax Department can delay or withhold giving effect to appellate orders without justification.
  2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to refund along with statutory and additional interest.
  3. Whether non-compliance with appellate orders violates statutory provisions and constitutional rights.

Petitioner’s Arguments

  • The respondents failed to pass appeal effect orders despite binding ITAT and High Court decisions.
  • Legitimate refunds due to the petitioner remained blocked without any lawful reason.
  • Several representations were made to the department, but no action was taken.
  • Such inaction violates:
    • Section 153(5) of the Income Tax Act
    • Articles 265 and 300A of the Constitution
  • The withholding of refunds is arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to settled law.

Respondent’s Arguments

  • The Revenue submitted that the process of issuing refunds was underway.
  • No substantial justification for delay in passing appeal effect orders was provided.

Court Findings / Order

  • The Delhi High Court noted that the relief sought was limited to implementation of existing appellate orders.
  • The Court disposed of the writ petitions with directions to:
    • Pass appeal effect orders, and
    • Release refunds in accordance with law
  • The Court directed that:
    • Refunds pursuant to ITAT orders and other judicial decisions must be issued
    • The entire exercise must be completed within six weeks
  • The Court clarified that:
    • Rights and contentions of all parties are kept open

Important Clarification

  • The judgment reinforces that tax authorities are bound to give timely effect to appellate orders.
  • Administrative delay cannot override statutory obligations.
  • Refunds lawfully due cannot be withheld arbitrarily.

Sections Involved

  • Section 244A(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 (Interest on Refund)
  • Section 244A(1A), Income Tax Act, 1961 (Additional Interest)
  • Section 153(5), Income Tax Act, 1961 (Time limit for giving effect to appellate orders)
  • Article 265, Constitution of India (No tax without authority of law)
  • Article 300A, Constitution of India (Right to property)

Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/MMH19102022CW147452022_190917.pdf

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.