Facts of the Case
- The
petitioner, Google Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, entered into a Google Cloud
Services Reseller Agreement with Google Cloud India Pvt. Ltd.
- The
Income Tax Department issued a certificate directing 10% TDS deduction
on payments made to the petitioner.
- The
petitioner had already been subjected to Equalisation Levy @ 2% on
the same transactions.
- The
petitioner argued that such deduction leads to double taxation.
- An
interim request was made to allow payments with reduced withholding.
Issues Involved
- Whether
TDS under Section 195 at 10% can be imposed when Equalisation Levy is
already applicable.
- Whether
surcharge and cess are applicable over DTAA-prescribed withholding tax
rates.
- Whether
reduced withholding can be permitted as an interim arrangement.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- Imposition
of 10% TDS along with 2% Equalisation Levy results in double taxation.
- Under
DTAA, the 10% withholding rate is inclusive of surcharge and cess,
and no additional levy is permissible.
- Relied
on precedent:
- Epcos
Electronic Components S.A. v. UOI (2020)
- Proposed
an interim solution of 8% withholding, considering 2% EL already
paid.
- Argued
that excess computation by the department was incorrect.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The
Assessing Officer proposed that instead of 8% deduction, a fixed
deposit amount (₹98.69 crores) should be directed.
- Asserted
that withholding should align with Section 115A read with DTAA
provisions.
Court’s Findings / Order
- The
Court acknowledged that:
- DTAA
rate of 10% includes surcharge and cess.
- No
additional levy can be imposed beyond this rate.
- Considering
the circumstances, the Court ordered:
- Interim
relief allowing payments subject to 8% TDS deduction.
- Such
deduction shall not be treated as non-compliance under Section
201.
- The arrangement was made purely as an interim measure pending final adjudication.
Important Clarifications
- DTAA
tax rates are inclusive of surcharge and cess.
- Equalisation
Levy and TDS interplay may lead to double taxation concerns,
requiring judicial intervention.
- Interim arrangements can be granted to balance revenue protection and taxpayer hardship.
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2022:DHC:440-DB/MMH03022022CW2152022_224803.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment