Facts of the Case
The present batch of writ petitions was filed by multiple assessees
challenging reassessment notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax
Act, 1961.
The impugned notices were issued after 01 April 2021,
but were based on the old reassessment regime existing prior to the
amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.
The petitioners contended that the notices were issued
without following the newly introduced mandatory procedure under Section
148A, which requires prior inquiry, opportunity of hearing, and passing of
an order before issuing reassessment notices.
The Court also referred to earlier similar matters where interim protection had been granted, particularly orders dated July 2021 in connected writ petitions
Issues Involved
- Whether
reassessment notices issued after 01.04.2021 under the old provisions
of Section 148 are valid in law.
- Whether
the Revenue could rely on extensions granted under the Relaxation Act,
2020 to bypass the new procedure introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.
- Whether compliance with Section 148A is mandatory for notices issued after 01.04.2021.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The
impugned notices are invalid ab initio as they were issued under
the old provisions despite the new law coming into force from 01.04.2021.
- The
Finance Act, 2021 substituted the entire reassessment scheme, making
Section 148A mandatory.
- Notices
issued without following the new procedure are without jurisdiction.
- The
Relaxation Act, 2020 cannot override substantive amendments brought by
Parliament.
- The old provisions ceased to exist after 31.03.2021, hence cannot be invoked thereafter.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The
Revenue argued that due to the Relaxation Act, 2020, timelines for
issuing notices stood extended.
- It
was contended that notices issued during the extended period would still
be governed by the old regime.
- The
respondents relied on statutory notifications extending time limits up to
June 2021.
- It was also argued that Section 148 notices were validly issued within extended limitation periods
Court’s Findings / Order
- The
Court observed a prima facie case in favour of the petitioners.
- It
held that once the new reassessment provisions came into force from 01
April 2021, the old provisions could not be invoked.
- The
Court noted that the new procedure under Section 148A must be followed.
- The
argument that the Relaxation Act allowed continuation of old provisions
was not accepted at the interim stage.
Interim Directions:
- The
respondents were restrained from taking any coercive steps pursuant
to the impugned reassessment notices.
- The
reassessment proceedings were kept in abeyance.
- Respondents
were directed to file counter affidavits.
- Matter was listed for further hearing.
Important Clarifications by the Court
- The
Court emphasized that procedural safeguards introduced by Finance Act,
2021 cannot be bypassed.
- Section
6 of the General Clauses Act cannot be used to revive repealed provisions
where a complete substitution of law has occurred.
- The Court acknowledged consistency with earlier interim orders passed in similar matters.
Sections Involved
- Section
147 – Income Escaping Assessment
- Section
148 – Issue of Notice for Reassessment
- Section
148A – Procedure for Reassessment (Inserted by Finance Act, 2021)
- Section
149 – Time Limit for Notice
- Section
151 – Sanction for Issue of Notice
- Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020
Link to download the order -
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools
0 Comments
Leave a Comment