Facts of the Case
The present writ petitions were filed by the
Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8) challenging the extension of
an interim stay order granted by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in
favor of M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.
The Revenue contended that the ITAT had extended the interim stay beyond the statutory limit of 365 days, which is expressly restricted under Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Issues
Involved
- Whether the ITAT has the authority to extend an interim stay beyond
365 days under Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- Whether such extension is valid when the delay in disposal is not attributable to the assessee.
Petitioner’s
Arguments (Revenue)
- The Revenue argued that Section 254(2A) clearly restricts the
extension of stay beyond 365 days.
- It was contended that the ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction by
extending the stay beyond the prescribed statutory period.
- The continuation of stay beyond 365 days is impermissible regardless of the circumstances.
Respondent’s
Arguments (Assessee)
- The respondent relied upon settled legal precedent.
- It was argued that where delay in disposal of appeal is not
attributable to the assessee, the stay can be extended beyond 365 days.
- Reliance was placed on judicial interpretation of Section 254(2A).
Court’s
Findings / Order
The Delhi High Court held that the issue raised by
the Revenue is already settled by its earlier judgment in:
Pepsico Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT (376 ITR 87)
The Court observed that the matter is covered by
the said precedent and therefore found no merit in the Revenue’s contention.
Accordingly:
- The writ petitions were dismissed.
- All pending applications were also disposed of.
Important
Clarification
The judgment reinforces that:
- Extension of stay beyond 365 days is permissible when delay is not
attributable to the assessee.
- Section 254(2A) must be interpreted in light of judicial precedents, particularly Pepsico Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT.
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2019:DHC:7906-DB/SRB26032019CW29152019_161100.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment