Facts of the Case

The Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The core dispute arose from the classification of income earned by the assessee, Select Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

The assessee had derived income which was partly treated as ‘income from business’ and partly as ‘income from house property’ by the Tribunal. Additionally, the assessee claimed depreciation on plant and equipment installed in common areas, while no depreciation was claimed on the building.

There were also procedural aspects including delay in filing and refiling appeals, which were condoned by the Court.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in bifurcating income into:
    • Income from business, and
    • Income from house property
  2. Whether payments made on account of debentures issued should be treated as amounts paid by the holding company for acquisition of share capital.

Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)

  • The Revenue challenged the Tribunal’s approach of dividing income under two separate heads.
  • It sought consideration of additional questions of law, including treatment of debenture-related payments as share capital acquisition.

Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)

  • The assessee clarified that:
    • No depreciation was claimed on the building.
    • Depreciation was claimed only on plant and equipment installed in common areas.
    • Common area maintenance charges were linked to such plant and machinery.

Court’s Findings / Order

  • The Court framed a substantial question of law only on the issue of:

Whether the Tribunal was right in bifurcating income into ‘business income’ and ‘income from house property’.

  • The Court refused to frame a question of law regarding:
    • Treatment of debenture payments as share capital.
  • Procedural directions:
    • Filing of paper books was dispensed with.
    • Liberty granted to file relevant documents within ten weeks.
  • Clarification regarding appeals:
    • Certain appeals were treated as pertaining to specific assessment years due to filing errors.
    • Some appeals were disposed of without prejudice to rights in the main appeal.

Important Clarification

  • The Court limited the scope strictly to income classification issue and declined to expand into debenture-related questions.
  • Appeals for certain assessment years were reorganized due to procedural mistakes.
  • Disposal of some appeals was made subject to the outcome of the primary appeal.

 

Sections Involved

  • Section 22 – Income from House Property
  • Section 28 – Profits and Gains from Business or Profession
  • Section 32 – Depreciation


Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2018:DHC:8330-DB/SKN05122018ITA8722018_162553.pdf

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.