Facts of the
Case
The present appeals were filed by the Revenue
before the Delhi High Court challenging the allowability of carry forward of
unabsorbed depreciation beyond eight years. The dispute arose in light of the
amendment brought by the Finance Act, 2001, which removed the earlier
restriction of eight years for carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation.
The Revenue contended that such extended carry
forward should not be permitted, whereas the assessee, Central Electronics,
claimed the benefit of indefinite carry forward as per the amended provisions.
Issues
Involved
- Whether unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward beyond eight
years in view of the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2001.
- Whether the issue raises any substantial question of law warranting
consideration by the High Court.
Petitioner’s
Arguments (Revenue)
- The Revenue challenged the allowance of carry forward of unabsorbed
depreciation beyond the earlier statutory limit of eight years.
- It was argued that the benefit of amendment should not be
interpreted in a manner that allows indefinite carry forward in the
present case.
Respondent’s
Arguments (Assessee)
- The assessee relied upon the amended provisions of Section 32(2) of
the Income Tax Act.
- It was contended that post amendment by the Finance Act, 2001, the
restriction of eight years was removed, thereby allowing indefinite carry
forward of unabsorbed depreciation.
- Reliance was placed on judicial precedent supporting such interpretation.
Court
Findings / Order
- The Delhi High Court observed that the issue is already covered
against the Revenue by its earlier judgment in Pr. CIT vs British Motor
Car Co. (1934) Ltd. (2018) 400 ITR 569 (Delhi).
- The Court held that no substantial question of law arises for
consideration in the present appeals.
- Accordingly, both appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed without any order as to costs.
Important
Clarification
- The judgment reinforces that after the amendment by the Finance
Act, 2001, unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward indefinitely.
- It confirms that settled legal position cannot be re-agitated where precedent clearly governs the issue.
Sections Involved
- Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Finance Act, 2001 (Amendment relating to depreciation carry forward)
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2018:DHC:8325-DB/SKN30112018ITA13482018_160421.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment