Facts of the Case

The Revenue filed multiple appeals against a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Years 2006–07 to 2011–12.

A search and seizure operation was conducted at the assessee’s premises on 19 October 2010, followed by issuance of notices under Section 153A.

For earlier assessment years (2006–07 to 2008–09), returns had already been filed and assessments were completed under Section 143(3) prior to the search.

The Assessing Officer made additions under Section 153A despite no incriminating material being found during the search.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether additions can be made under Section 153A in absence of incriminating material found during search.
  2. Whether completed assessments can be reopened without fresh evidence discovered during search proceedings.
  3. Validity of reliance on third-party statements recorded under Section 133A without cross-examination.

Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)

  • The Revenue relied on statements recorded during survey proceedings under Section 133A in the case of M/s Nitin Enterprises.
  • It was alleged that the assessee obtained bogus bills and routed payments through cheques, later receiving cash.
  • The Revenue contended that such statements justified additions under Section 153A.

Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)

  • No incriminating material was found during the search to justify reopening of completed assessments.
  • The assessee produced documentary evidence showing genuine business transactions.
  • It was argued that third-party statements were recorded behind its back and no opportunity for cross-examination was provided.
  • Reliance was placed on the precedent laid down in CIT v. Kabul Chawla (2016) 380 ITR 573.

Court Findings / Order

  • The Court upheld the findings of CIT(A) and ITAT that no incriminating material was found during the search.
  • It reaffirmed that for completed assessments, additions under Section 153A cannot be made without incriminating material.
  • The Court noted that:
    • Statements relied upon were not subjected to cross-examination.
    • Documentary evidence produced by the assessee was not rebutted by the Revenue.
  • The Court held that no substantial question of law arose in the appeals.
  • All appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.

Important Clarifications

  • Section 153A does not permit arbitrary reassessment of completed assessments without incriminating evidence.
  • Statements recorded under Section 133A without cross-examination have weak evidentiary value.
  • The judgment reinforces the principle laid down in CIT v. Kabul Chawla.

Sections Involved

  • Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
  • Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
  • Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Link to download the order -

https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2019:DHC:7417-DB/SMD22072019ITA6582019_164954.pdf

Disclaimer

This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.