Facts of the
Case
The petitioners, Shreya Aeren and Sanjeev
J. Aeren, filed writ petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging
proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department. During the course of the
hearing, it was submitted by the petitioners that statutory appeals had
already been filed before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].
Accordingly, the petitioners sought permission from the Court to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to pursue all grounds raised in the petitions before the appellate authority.
Issues
Involved
- Whether the High Court should entertain writ petitions when an effective
alternative statutory remedy is already available and invoked.
- Whether the petitioners should be granted liberty to raise all grounds before the appellate authority (CIT(A)) after withdrawal of writ petitions.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
- The petitioners submitted that they had already filed statutory
appeals before CIT(A).
- They requested the Court to allow withdrawal of the writ petitions.
- They further sought liberty to raise all issues and grounds before the appellate authority.
Respondent’s
Arguments
- The Revenue, represented by its counsel, did not raise substantial
objections to the withdrawal request.
- The matter was left to the discretion of the Court regarding withdrawal and liberty.
Court Order
/ Findings
- The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petitions.
- Liberty was granted to the petitioners to urge all grounds
before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
- The petitions were accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Important
Clarification (Order dated 28.05.2019)
Subsequently, a clarification application was
allowed by the Court, adding that:
- The petitioners are at liberty to approach CIT(A) for expeditious
disposal of the appeal.
- The appellate authority was requested to preferably decide the
appeal within three months from receipt of the order.
Sections Involved
- Income Tax Act, 1961 –
Provisions relating to appeals before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India – Writ Jurisdiction
- Principle of Alternative Remedy (Exhaustion of statutory remedies before invoking writ jurisdiction)
Link to download the order -https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2019:DHC:7591-DB/SMD13052019CW26292019_130627.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment