Facts of the Case
The Revenue preferred two appeals before the Delhi High
Court against the respondent, M/s Seasons Textiles Ltd. The appeals were filed
under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
During the course of proceedings, it was observed that the tax
effect involved in both appeals was below Rs. 50,00,000. As per CBDT
Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, appeals below the prescribed monetary
threshold are not to be pursued by the Revenue.
The Court examined the applicability of the said circular to the present appeals.
Issues Involved
- Whether
the Revenue appeals are maintainable when the tax effect is below the
prescribed monetary limit under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018?
- Whether the High Court is required to adjudicate substantial questions of law in such cases?
Petitioner’s Arguments (Revenue)
- The
Revenue filed appeals raising substantial questions of law against the
order of the lower authority.
- It sought adjudication of the issues involved despite the monetary threshold.
Respondent’s Arguments (Assessee)
- The
respondent relied on CBDT Circular No. 3/2018.
- It was contended that since the tax effect is below Rs. 50 lakhs, the appeals are not maintainable and should not be entertained.
Court’s Findings / Order
- The
Delhi High Court held that the tax effect in the present appeals is
below Rs. 50,00,000.
- In
view of CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, the Court declined to examine the
substantial questions of law.
- The appeals were disposed of without answering the substantial questions of law, which were kept open.
Important Clarification by the Court
- The
Court granted liberty to the Revenue to file an application for revival
of the appeals.
- Such
revival is permissible if the case falls within any exception provided
under the CBDT Circular.
Sections Involved
- Income
Tax Act, 1961 – Appeals Provisions (Section 260A)
- CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 (Monetary Limits for Filing Appeals
Link to download the order -
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment