Facts of the Case
The
assessee, St. Thomas Syro Malabar Catholic Church, is a charitable institution
engaged in religious and charitable activities. It was originally registered
under Section 12AA with effect from Assessment Year 2020-21. Pursuant to
amendments introduced by the Taxation and Other Laws Act, 2020, the assessee
applied in Form 10A and was granted provisional registration under Section 12A
from Assessment Years 2021-22 to 2023-24. Thereafter, the assessee filed an
application in Form 10AB on 29.11.2024 seeking registration for Assessment Year
2025-26. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application on the ground that
incorrect and contradictory information had been furnished, particularly
relating to claim of exemption under Section 11 in earlier years. Aggrieved by
the rejection order passed in Form 10AD, the assessee preferred an appeal
before the Tribunal.
Issues Involved
Whether
rejection of Form 10AB for registration under Section 12A was justified when
the assessee was already holding valid provisional registration, whether an
inadvertent error in filing Form 10AB or in furnishing information could
justify denial of registration, and whether the order of the CIT (Exemption)
was contrary to principles of natural justice.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The
assessee contended that it was a bona fide charitable institution duly
registered under Section 12AA and later under Section 12A on a provisional
basis, and that exemption under Sections 11 and 12 had been rightly claimed
during the period of valid registration. It was submitted that the filing of
Form 10AB involved inadvertent errors, including selection of assessment year,
and that such procedural mistakes could not defeat substantive statutory
rights. It was further argued that the CIT (Exemption) had not raised any
objection regarding genuineness of objects or activities of the trust and
therefore rejection of registration was unjustified.
Respondent’s Arguments
The
Revenue supported the order of the CIT (Exemption) and contended that the
assessee had furnished incorrect information in Form 10AB and the accompanying
undertaking, justifying rejection of the application for registration under
Section 12A.
Court Order / Findings
The
ITAT Kolkata held that the issue involved in the present appeal was squarely
covered by the decision of the coordinate bench in the assessee’s own case for
an earlier year. The Tribunal observed that the assessee was already registered
prior to the amendments introduced in 2020 and was entitled to registration for
a block of five years. It was further held that the filing of Form 10AB for an
incorrect assessment year was an inadvertent procedural error and that the
assessee was entitled to seek withdrawal of such form. The Tribunal held that
denial of registration on account of such mistake would result in grave
injustice and defeat the beneficial provisions applicable to genuine charitable
institutions. Relying on settled judicial principles permitting raising of pure
legal grounds at the appellate stage, the Tribunal set aside the order of the
CIT (Exemption).
Important Clarification
The
Tribunal clarified that procedural lapses or inadvertent mistakes in filing
electronic forms cannot override substantive rights of charitable institutions
where genuineness of objects and activities is not in dispute. Registration
under Section 12A is a beneficial provision and must be administered in a
manner that advances the object of the law rather than defeating it on
technical grounds.
Final Outcome
The
appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. The order passed by the CIT
(Exemption) rejecting the application in Form 10AB was set aside, and the
assessee was directed to be granted registration under Section 12A in
accordance with law.
Source Link- https://itat.gov.in/public/files/upload/1768297867-k8XAaW-1-TO.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment